Development of integrated thematic teaching material used discovery learning model in grade V elementary school

  • Desyandri Desyandri 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Muhammadi Muhammadi
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Mansurdin Mansurdin
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Rijal Fahmi
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

This research is intends develop integrated thematic learning materials by using discovery learning (DL) model in the 5th grade of elementary school. It categorize this research into research and development study. The model includes four phases, defining, designing, developing, and disseminating phases. However, it did not include the disseminating phases. The subjects of the research were 5th grade students. The results of the research show that the validity score of the learning materials developed is 3,36. Questionnaire and interviews with the teachers and the students reveal that the materials developed are practical. The score given by the teachers is 96, 43%, and by the students is 84, 5%. Based on the results, we conclude it that the integrated thematic learning materials developed by using (DL) model are valid and practical to be use in the learning process.
Keywords
  • developing
  • integrated
  • thematic
  • learning materials
  • discovery learning
References
  1. Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21 St Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–155.
  2. Amiyani, R., & Widjajanti, J. B. (2019). Self-confidence and mathematics achievement using guided discovery learning in scientific approach. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042093
  3. Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  4. Barrett, P., Gaskins, J., & Haug, J. (2019). Higher education under fire: implementing and assessing a culture change for sustainment. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(1), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2018-0098
  5. Bequette, M., Cardiel, C. L. B., Cohn, S., Kollmann, E. K., & Lawrenz, F. (2019). Evaluation Capacity Building for Informal STEM Education: Working for Success Across the Field. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20351
  6. Capuano, N., & Toti, D. (2019). Experimentation of a smart learning system for law based on knowledge discovery and cognitive computing. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.034
  7. Cheng, S.-F. (2018). Application of Creative Teaching. Hu Li Za Zhi The Journal of Nursing, 65(6), 4. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.201812_65(6).01
  8. Desyandri. (2011). Peningkatan Pembelajaran Seni Musik Berbasis Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa di Pendidikan Dasar. In Seminar Internasional Etnik Serumpun Indonesia-Malaysia.
  9. Desyandri. (2012). The Usage of CTL Approach to Improve the Process and Learning of Singing to Studen Class III Elementary School. Jurnal Pedagogi FIP UNP.
  10. Desyandri; Vernanda, D. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik terpadu di kelas v sekolah dasar menggunakan identifikasi masalah Desyandri. In Seminar Nasional HDPGSDI Wilayah 4 (pp. 163–174).
  11. Faisal. (2014). Sukses Mengawali Kurikulum 2013 di SD.Yogyakarta: Diandra Creative.
  12. Hernawan, A. H. (2009). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Tematik di Kelas Awal Sekolah Dasar. Makalah.
  13. Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Konseptual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
  14. Kobayashi, K. (2019). Interactivity: A potential determinant of learning by preparing to teach and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02755
  15. Kung, F.-W. (2019). Teaching second language reading comprehension: the effects of classroom materials and reading strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1364252
  16. Kurniasih, I dan Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Surabaya: Kata Pena.
  17. Lenk, T., Glinka, P., & Hesse, M. (2019). Educational Federalism in Germany–Financial Evaluation of the Constitutional Law Amendment . Wirtschaftsdienst, 99(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-019-2418-8
  18. Machali, I. (2014). Kebijakan perubahan kurikulum 2013 dalam menyongsong Indonesia emas tahun 2045. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 71–94.
  19. Malsbary, C. B. (2018). Teachers as Creative Designers in Transnationalism. Urban Education, 53(10), 1238–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915613548
  20. Muslich, M. (2010). Text Book Writing. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media Group
  21. Plom, T. Dan Nieveen, N. (Eds). (2017). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Enschede: SLO (Netherlands institute for curriculum development).
  22. Prastowo, A. (2014). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik: Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praktis. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.
  23. Priatna, N., Martadipura, B. A. P., & Lorenzia, S. (2019). Development of mathematic’s teaching materials using project-based learning integrated STEM. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042006
  24. Riyanto,Y. (2010). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran: Sebagai Referensi Bagi Pendidik dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran yang Efektif dan Berkualitas. Surabaya: Prenada Media.
  25. Ridwan & Sunarto. (2007). Pengantar Statistik Untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan, Sosial, Komunikasi, Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  26. Saputri, A. T. W. (2017). Pengembangan Desain Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif Berbasis Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar. Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP-UKSW.
  27. Siregar, Sy. (2011). Statistika Deskriptif untuk Penelitan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  28. Sukerti, N. N., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suarni, N. K. (2015). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu melalui Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Minat Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 2 Tibubeneng Kuta Utara. PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 4(1).
  29. Syarafina, D. N., & Mahmudi, A. (2019). The effect of guided discovery learning on student self-efficacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042095
  30. Teplykh, M. S., Akhmetzyanova, M. P., & Bashirova, T. A. (2019). Problematization as an innovative form of philosophy teaching. Perspektivy Nauki I Obrazovania, 37(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2019.1.9

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 5911 times
PDF
: 3632 times