Why are the younger generation anti-political?: critical discourse analysis on political education for beginners

Saherimiko Saherimiko(1), Ira Patriani(2), Nahot Tua Parlindungan Sihaloho(3), Martinus Martinus(4), Herri Junius Nge(5),
(1) Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak  Indonesia
(4) Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak  Indonesia
(5) Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/1100900

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


There are numerous ways for the younger generation to participate in politics, but there are evidence that they are unwilling to join (anti-politics). This study tries to expose two things: (1) the causes of this trend, and (2) remedies to support smooth political circulation in Indonesia as a democratic country. This study accomplishes this purpose by employing Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). Data acquired from the controversial documentary Sexy Killer's netnography on YouTube. This study highlights several significant findings, particularly the ambivalence and conflict between reality and ideals in today's youth and society. They are skeptical of the earnestness and dedication of government leaders elected through a democratic political process. At the same time, people expect government personnel to carry out their responsibilities. The implications of this study's findings are a criticism of the political education model, which has so far prioritized practical factors above theoretical aspects (content, composition, and proportion).

Keywords


Anti-political; Political education for beginner; Political participation

References


Achir, N., & Rahim, E. I. (2023). Political education strategy for millennial voters in higher education. Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0

Al-Hamdi, R., & Sofyan, N. (2023). To what extent political education can influence young voters’ perceptions? Journal of Government and Civil Society, 7(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v7i1.7259

Al-Hudaibi, M. (1997). The principles of politics in Islam (pp. 1–45).

Anjani, A. (2021). Reinforcement political education for the young generation through podcast-based political literacy to increase political participation in elections the digital era. Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Social Sciences and Education, Icsse, 33–41. https://icsse.ppkn.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Aulia-Anjani_Reinforcement-Political-Education-for-the-Young-Generation-through-Podcast-Based-Political-Literacy-to-Increase-Political-Participation-in-Elections-the-Digital-Era-Aulia-Anjani.pdf

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (translated by Annette Lavers). The Noonday Press.

Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self determined learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1076

BPS. (2022). Jumlah penduduk usia 15 tahun ke atas menurut golongan umur 2021-2022. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/6/715/1/jumlah-penduduk-usia-15-tahun-ke-atas-menurut-golongan-umur.html

Budiardjo, M. (1998). Partisipasi dan partai politik. Pustaka Obor.

Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903477102

Cummings, S., Haan, L. De, & Seferiadis, A. (2020). How to use critical discourse analysis for policy analysi: A guideline for policymakers and other professionals. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 15(1), 99–108.

Dremel, A., & Matić, R. (2014). Discourse and/as social practice – The analysis of the problem of resistance and hegemony. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(22), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n22p155

Droste, L. (2021). Feeling left behind by political decisionmakers: Anti‐establishment sentiment in contemporary democracies. Politics and Governance, 9(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.3949

Ekström, M., & Shehata, A. (2018). Social media, porous boundaries, and the development of online political engagement among young citizens. New Media and Society, 20(2), 740–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816670325

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critial study of language (2nd ed.).

Farthing, R. (2010). The politics of youthful antipolitics: Representing the “issue” of youth participation in politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903233696

Flathman, R. E. (2020). Political obligation. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. (Issue Mi). Routledge.

Green, A. (2017). Generational inequalities in education, work, housing and welfare. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hariyanti, & Sari, F. A. (2021). Election Smart House (ESH) as a pre-voter political education facility to improve the quality of democracy. Journal of Etika Demokrasi, 6(1), 1–11.

Harsono, H. (2023). Politik identitas dan partisipasi politik di media sosial: Analisis model struktural pada generasi Z di Kota Malang. Electoral Governance: Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 4(2), 166–187.

Henn, M., Weinstein, M., & Wring, D. (2002). A generation apart? Youth and political participation in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856x.t01-1-00001

Heywood, A. (2015). Political theory: An introduction (4th (ed.)). Macmillan Pub.

Jahedi, M., Abdullah, F. S., & Mukundan, J. (2015). An overview of focal approaches of critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2(4), 195–196. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.2n.4p.28

Jarvis, P. (1994). Adult education and the state: Towards a politics of adult education. In British Journal of Educational Studies (Vol. 42, Issue 1). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2307/3122230

Juelich, C. L. (2022). Millennials rising: A new resource model for youth political participation [University of Iowa]. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.005575

Keating, A., & Melis, G. (2017). Social media and youth political engagement: Preaching to the converted or providing a new voice for youth? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117718461

Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Shivraj, P., Basaraba, D., & Yovanoff, P. (2019). Considerations for using mathematical learning progressions to design diagnostic assessments. Measurement, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2018.1479087

Miftakhuddin, Mustadi, A., & Zulfiati, H. M. (2019). Misconceptions between social studies and social sciences among pre-service elementary teachers. International Journal of Education, 12(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v12i1.17514

OECD. (2020). Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice: Fit for all generations? OECD Public Governance Reviews, 1–156. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/governance-for-youth-trust-and-intergenerational-justice_c3e5cb8a-en#page1%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/governance-for-youth-trust-and-intergenerational-justice_c3e5cb8a-en

Pontes, A. I., Henn, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Youth political (dis)engagement and the need for citizenship education: Encouraging young people’s civic and political participation through the curriculum. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197917734542

Putnam, L. L. (2015). Unpacking the dialectic: Alternative views on the discourse-materiality relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 706–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12115

Rafni, A. L., & Suryanef, S. (2019). The development of election smart house as a tool of political education based on local wisdomThe development of election smart house as a tool of political education based on local wisdom. Mimbar, 35(1), 69–77.

Robin, P., Alvin, S., & Hasugian, T. (2022). Gen-Z perspective on politics: High interest, uninformed, and urging political education. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 11(3), 183–189.

Sloam, B. Y. J. (2007). Rebooting democracy : Youth participation in politics in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs Vol., 60(4), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsm035

Soleha, R. S., Widodo, U., Sophia, E., Rahimia, N., & Hayat, M. A. (2022). The General election commission strategy through election education in increasing the political participation of beginners voters based on democracy principles. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 2(2), 119–128.

Stoker, L. (2014). Reflections on the study of generations in politics. Forum (Germany), 12(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2014-5012

Suparno, Karnamis, & Sunaryo, A. (2020). Government strategy in political education as public participation improvement to reach democracy system in Semarang city. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 5(1), 86–101.

Suryani, R., & Suryanef. (2022). Program pendidikan politik oleh partai politik untuk meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat menghadapi pilkada 2020 (studi pada DPD PAN dan DPC Gerindra di Nagari Talang Kabupaten Solok). Journal of Education, Cultural and Politics, 2(1), 46–54.

Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In J. W. Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. Routledge.

Tessler, M. (2007). Morocco’s next political generation. The Journal of North African Studies, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629380008718385 PLEASE

van Deth, J. W. (2016). What is political participation? Democratic Theory, 5(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.68

Wade, R. C. (2007). Social studies for justice: Teaching strategies for the elementary classroom. Teachers College Press.

Wahyu, Y. (2023). Politik anak muda, mau kemana? Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2023/03/29/politik-anak-muda-mau-kemana?status=sukses_login&status_login=login

White, C., Bruce, S., & Ritchie, J. (2000). Young people’s politics political interest and engagement amongst 14–24 year olds. National Centre for Social Research.

Womack, K., & Davis, T. (2006). Mythology, remythology, and demythology: The beatles on film. In Reading the Beatles: Cultural Studies, Literary Criticism, 2and the Fab Four. State Universty of New York Press.

Zachara, M. (2020). The Millennial generation in the context of political power: A leadership gap? Leadership, 16(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019885704

Zhang, W. (2022). Political disengagement among youth: A comparison between 2011 and 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(April). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809432


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 214 times
 PDF Downloaded : 34 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.