Analisis perilaku kepemimpinan guru Indonesia di era pandemi Covid 19 menggunakan Rasch

  • Donna Sampaleng 
    STT IKAT
    Indonesia
  • Yuyun Elizabeth Patras
    Universitas Pakuan
    Indonesia
  • Baharuddin Baharuddin
    Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi
    Indonesia
  • Rais Hidayat
    Universitas Pakuan
    Indonesia

Abstract

Valid and reliable information regarding teacher leadership behavior in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic is very important. This study aims to find a reliable research instrument on teacher leadership in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic and at the same time recommend important findings for improving teacher leadership behavior. The study began with a theoretical study to obtain content validity, continued with expert validity, readability trials, and finally distributed the instrument via online. Analysis of research data using the Rasch model with 6 tests. The research data comes from 1200 teachers in Indonesia. The findings are: (1) recommended 10 items of instruments for research on teacher leadership behavior in the era of the covid 19 pandemic, (2) recommended 4 important findings to improve the condition of teacher leadership behavior, namely: (i) reflection skill, (ii) collaboration and communication, (iii) learning technology, and (iv) learning community.
References
  1. Abdaziz, A., Jusoh, M. S., & Amlus, H. (2014). Construct Validity : A Rasch Measurement Model Approaches. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 9(September), 7–12.
  2. Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian Education and Its Relation to the Philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar.” Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9
  3. Abidin, Z. (2020). THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON EDUCATION AND JUDICIAL PRACTICE IN INDONESIA. RI’AYAH, 5(2), 121–130.
  4. Ahya, M., Ahmad, S., & Fitriani, Y. (2021). The Role of Principal and Teacher Leadership to Improve the Quality of Learning in SMA Negeri 5 OKU. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i2.134
  5. Altinay, F., Dagli, G., & Altinay, Z. (2016). The Role of Information Technology in Becoming Learning Organization. Procedia Computer Science, 102(August), 663–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.459
  6. Baghaei, P. (2014). The Rasch Model as a Construct Validation Tool. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 22(1).
  7. Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2020). Correction to: Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences. In Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5_21
  8. Bressman, S., Winter, J. S., & Efron, S. E. (2018). Next generation mentoring: Supporting teachers beyond induction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.003
  9. Brinkman, W.-P. (2009). Design of a Questionnaire Instrument. Handbook of Mobile Technology Research Methods, December, 31–57.
  10. Carvalho, L. de F., Primi, R., & Meyer, G. J. (2012a). Application of the Rasch model in measuring personality disorders. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 34(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-60892012000200009
  11. Carvalho, L. de F., Primi, R., & Meyer, G. J. (2012b). Application of the Rasch model in measuring personality disorders Aplicação. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 34(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-60892012000200009
  12. Davier, M. von. (2007). Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models (C. H. Carstensen (ed.)). Springer.
  13. de Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2019). School-based teacher collaboration: Different learning opportunities across various contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102925
  14. Di Pietro, G., Biagi, F., Costa, P., Karpiński, Z., & Mazza, J. (2020). The Likely Impact of COVID-19 on Education: Reflections based on the Existing Literature and Recent International Datasets. In Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg: Vol. EUR 30275 (Issue JRC121071). https://doi.org/10.2760/126686
  15. Doumanis, I., Economou, D., Sim, G. R., & Porter, S. (2018). The impact of multimodal Collaborative Virtual Environments on Learning: A gamified online debate. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.017
  16. Emerson, R. W. (2017). Likert Scales. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(5), 488–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1711100511
  17. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  18. Eupena, R. G. (2012). Teacher Communication Behavior: It’s Impact to the Students’ Attitude in Learning Science. IAMURE International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.7718/ijss.v3i1.35
  19. Fidan, T., & Oztürk, I. (2015). The Relationship of the Creativity of Public and Private School Teachers to Their Intrinsic Motivation and the School Climate for Innovation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370
  20. Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220(April), 107460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033
  21. Ghazali, N. H. M. (2016). A Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Evaluate the School-Based Assessment System : A Pilot Study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 148–157.
  22. Hadžibajramović, E., Schaufeli, W., & De Witte, H. (2020). A Rasch analysis of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). PLoS ONE, 15(11 November), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242241
  23. Hamzah, N., Noor, M. A. M., & Yusof, H. (2016). Teacher Leadership Concept: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i12/2483
  24. Harjanto, I., Lie, A., Wihardini, D., Pryor, L., & Wilson, M. (2018). Community-based teacher professional development in remote areas in Indonesia. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1415515
  25. Harris, A. (2005). Teacher Leadership: More than Just a Feel-Good Factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244777
  26. Hidayat, R., Suhardi, E., & Patras, Y. E. (2019). Instrumen Kepuasan Mahasiswa Universitas Swasta Dengan Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2019.v6.i2.p169-178
  27. Hussen, A. A., & Teshome, T. Z. (2016). Teachers Professional Commitment towards Students Learning , their Profession and the Community in Eastern Ethiopian Secondary Schools Doğu Etiyopya ’ daki Orta Dereceli Okullarda Öğretmenlerin Öğrenci Öğrenmesine , Mesleklerine ve Topluluğa Yönelik Bağlı. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 5(3), 289–314.
  28. Jackson, T., Burrus, J., Bassett, K., & Roberts, R. D. (2010). Teacher Leadership: an Assessment Framework for an Emerging Area of Professional Practice. ETS Research Report Series, 2010(2), i–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2010.tb02234.x
  29. Jaeger, L., & Jaeger, E. L. (2013). Supports , Barriers , and Results Teacher Reflection : Schon and the Reflective Practitioner. Issues in Teacher Education, 22(1), 89–104.
  30. Jesyca R.T. Muaju, Adi Setiawan, T. M. (2013). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Menggunakan Metode Boostrap pada Kuisioner Ripe Yes/No Questions. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Pendidikan Sains VII, 513.
  31. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975
  32. Jusoh. (2018). Construct Validity for Measuring Entrepreneurial Readiness Among Malaysian Higher Education Students : A Stochastic Measurement Model Approach. MATEC Web of Conferences 150, 150, 1–4.
  33. Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students’ Academic Success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18–21.
  34. Lapeniene, D., & Dumciene, A. (2014). Teachers’ Creativity: Different Approaches and Similar Results. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.208
  35. Latham, D., Julien, H., Gross, M., & Witte, S. (2016). The role of inter-professional collaboration to support science learning : An exploratory study of the perceptions and experiences of science teachers , public librarians , and school librarians. Library and Information Science Research, 38(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.08.002
  36. Liu, Y. (2021). Contextual influence on formal and informal teacher leadership. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2(October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100028
  37. Lourdes Merono, Antonio Calderón, and J. L. A.-E. (2021). Digital pedagogy and cooperative learning: Effect on the technological pedagogical content knowledge and academic achievement of pre-service teachers. Revista de Psicodidáctica, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.10.002
  38. Lowery-Moore, H., Latimer, R., & Villate, V. (2016). The Essence of Teacher Leadership: A Phenomenological Inquiry of Professional Growth. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 7(1), 1–16.
  39. Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University, 17(3), 1–32.
  40. Mohamad, M. M., Lisa, N., Sern, L. C., & Mohd, K. (2015). Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
  41. Mohamed, M. B., & Ahmed, T. M. (2020). Developing technology acceptance model for e-service purposes. Management Science Letters, 10(10), 2221–2228. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.3.013
  42. Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141
  43. Othman, N. B. (2014). Assessing Construct Validity and Reliability Of Competitiveness Scale Using Rasch Model Approach. The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, 113–120.
  44. Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
  45. Pollock, J. L. (1967). Logical Validity in Modal Logic. Monist, 51(1), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196751118
  46. Pranatawijaya, V. H., Widiatry, W., Priskila, R., & Putra, P. B. A. A. (2019). Penerapan Skala Likert dan Skala Dikotomi Pada Kuesioner Online. Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, 5(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v5i2.185
  47. Putra, P., Liriwati, F. Y., Tahrim, T., Syafrudin, S., & Aslan, A. (2020). The Students Learning from Home Experiences during Covid-19 School Closures Policy In Indonesia. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i2.1019
  48. Rachmah, N., & Putrawan, I. M. (2018). Teachers Leadership and Trust: Its Effect on Teachers Performance. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 8(1), 1–5. www.ijsrp.org
  49. Rachman, T., & Napitupulu, D. B. (2017). Rasch Model for Validation a User Acceptance Instrument for Evaluating E-learning System. CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v11i1.2042
  50. Rahman, B. (2014). Refleksi Diri Dan Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru. Paedagogia, 17(1), 1–12.
  51. Rahmawati, E. (2019). Developing instruments of teacher ’ s perception of critical thinking in elementary school. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(4), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i4.13232
  52. RERKE, V. I., TATARINOVA, L. V, BUBNOVA, I. S., BABITSKAYA, L. A., & BAKHAREVA, E. V. (2020). Creativity and innovations of teachers of modern school: empirical aspect. Creatividad e Innovación de Los Profesores de La Escuela Moderna: Aspecto Empírico., 41(6), 1. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=142572636&site=eds-live
  53. Saputra, N., Nugroho, R., Aisyah, H., & Karneli, O. (2021). Digital Skill During Covid-19: Effects of Digital Leadership and Digital Collaboration. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 19(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2021.019.02.04
  54. Schleicher, A. (2017). Transforming Education for the Next Generation : A practical guide to learning and teaching with technology.
  55. Sharar, T., & Nawab, A. (2020). Teachers’ perceived teacher leadership practices: A case of private secondary schools in Lahore, Pakistan. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100049
  56. Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31(August), 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357
  57. Sokol, A., Gozdek, A., & Figurska, I. (2015). The Importance of Teacher Leadership in Shaping the Creative Attitudes of Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 1976–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.569
  58. Sööt, A., & Viskus, E. (2015). Reflection on Teaching: A Way to Learn from Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(November), 1941–1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.591
  59. Sumintono, B. (2016). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Asesmen Pendidikan: Implementasi Penilaian Formatif (Assessment For Learning). Makalah Dipresentasikan Dalam Kuliah Umum Pada Jurusan Statistika, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, Surabaya, 17 Maret 2016., March, 1–19. http://eprints.um.edu.my/15876/1/ITS_rasch_model_asesment_for_learning.pdf
  60. Sumintono, B. (2020). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch dalam menyiapkan Bank Soal. Fakultas Pendidikan.
  61. Tadesse, S., & Muluye, W. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Education System in Developing Countries: A Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 08(10), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.810011
  62. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
  63. Utari, R. (2012). Pembentukan iklim sekolah menuju learning community. In Laporan Penelitian Kelompok (pp. 1–21). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  64. van Buuren, S., & Wijnmalen, D. J. D. (2015). Measuring Psychosocial Impact of CBRN Incidents by the Rasch Model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 16(3), 242–250.
  65. Villalonga-Olives, E., Kawachi, I., & Rodríguez, A. M. (2021). Rasch model of the bridging social capital questionnaire. SSM - Population Health, 14, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100791
  66. Wahyu Hidayat, Fitri, U. R. B. (2020). The Analysis Of Auditor Emotional Intelligence Using The Rasch Model. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 3(3), 342–352.
  67. Widi, R. (2011). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Penelitian Epidemiologi Kedokteran Gigi. Stomatognatic (J.K.G. Unej) Vol., 8(1), 27–34.
  68. Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Applying The Rasch Model To Psycho-Social Measurement A Practical Approach. Educational Measurement Solutions.
  69. Yaacob, W. S. W., & Don, D. Y. (2018). Teacher Leadership Model: Roles and Values. Journal of Social Science Research, 12(1), 2556–2567. https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v12i1.6994
  70. Yaghmal. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v3i1.870
  71. Yusof, F. M., & Halim, H. (2014). Understanding Teacher Communication Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(October), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.324
  72. Zile-Tamsen, C. Van. (2017). Using Rasch Analysis to Inform Rating Scale. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9448-0
  73. Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 476 times
PDF
: 180 times