Modeling techniques in counseling in high school to improve the behavior prosocial

Nina Permata Sari(1), Muhammad Andri Setiawan(2), Rosida Andriani(3),
(1) Universitas Lambung Mangkurat  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Lambung Mangkurat  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Lambung Mangkurat  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/139600

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The development of the technological era 4.0 which has an impact on the erosion of individual awareness of the social environment is characterized by low prosocial behavior. Alternative solutions offered to improve prosocial behavior through the use of modeling techniques, by using this technique the goal achieved is to improve the ability of prosocial behavior in high school students. This study took place in SMAN 9 Banjarmasin, based on the distribution of questionnaires obtained by 6 students who have low prosocial behavior. Based on the results of the investigation statistically, the results show the value of z = -2.201 while for the value of ztab = -0.0139, which means zhit>ztab so that Ha is accepted and at the Asymp value. Sig. (2-tailed) = 0.028 <0.05 = 0.05% so that it can be interpreted as modeling techniques that can improve the ability of prosocial behavior. Therefore, modeling techniques can be relied upon to improve prosocial behavior.

Keywords


Modeling Techniques, Prosocial Behavior, Students

References


Apriliana, I Putu Agus, Suarni Ni Ketut & Dharsana, I Ketut. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Symbolic Modelling Technique for Intervening the Low Promiscuity of Students. Bisma The Journal of Counseling. 3 (1), 1-06, from http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v3i1.17910.

Astuti, Budi. (2012). Modul konseling kelompok. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Astuti, Dewi Anita. (2017, 13 August). Optimalisasi peran guru bimbingan dan konseling dalam menguatkan nilai-nilai moral remaja yang berkarakter. Paper presented at Seminar Nasional Bimbingan dan Konseling in Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/snbkuad/article/view/57/62.

Carlo, G, White, RMB, Streit, C, Knight, GP, & Zeiders, KH. (2018). Longitudinal Relations Among Parenting Styles. Prosocial Behaviors, and Academic Outcomes in U.S. Mexican Adolescents. Child Development, 89 (2), 577-592, from doi: 10.1111/cdev.12761.

Coulombe, Brianne R, Rudd Kristen L. & Yates, Tuppett M. (2019). Children’s Physiological Reactivity in Emotion Contexts and Prosocial Behavior. Journal Brain and Behavior, 9(10), 1-16, from doi: 10.1002/brb3.1380.

Dayakisni, Tri & Hudaniah. (2009). Psikologi sosial. Malang: UMM Press.

Donald, JN, Sahdra, BK, Van Zanden, B, Duineveld, JJ, Atkins, PWB, Marshall, SL, & Ciarrochi, J. (2019). Does Your Mindfulness Benefit Others? A systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Link Between Mindfulness and Prosocial Behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 110 (1), 101-125, from doi: 10.1111/bjop.12338.

Flook, Lisa, Waxler, Zahn Carolyn & Davidson, J, Richard. (2019). Developmental Differences in Prosocial Behavior Between Preschool and Late Elementary School. Front Psychology, 3, 9-12, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00876.

Foulkes, L, Leung, JT, Fuhrmann, D, Knoll, LJ, & Blakemore, SJ (2018). Age Differences in the Prosocial Influence Effect. Journal of Developmental Science, 21 (6), 1-9, from doi: 10.1111/desc.12666.

Fuadi, Luthfi, Gading, Ketut & Darsana, Ketut. (2019, 22-25 July). Effectiveness of the application of counseling theory behavioral with modelling techniques to increase the desire to solve something well and successfully through lesson study in Sukasada. Paper presented at International Conference on Technology and Educational Science in Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32698/40297.

Futamura, Ikumi. (2018). Is Extraordinary Prosocial Behavior More Valuable than Ordinary Prosocial Behavior? PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1-15, from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196340.

Hoorn, Jorien van, Fuligni, Andrew J, Crone, Eveline A, & Galvan, Adriana. (2016). Peer Influence Effects on Risk-taking and Prosocial Decision-making in Adolescence: Insights from Neuroimaging Studies. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 59–64, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.007.

I, Chitra C & Noor, M. (2019). Development of Guidance and Counseling Model Service with Bibliotherapy Techniques to Improve Prosocial Behavior for Student of Primary School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1179, 1-6, from doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012060.

Keumala, Elsa, Nurihsan, Juntika & Budiamin, Amin. (2018). The Development of Career Learning Program with Modelling Techniques to Improve Student Career Awareness. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 1 (1), 53-61, from https://doi.org/10.25217/igcj.v1i2.270.

Knoll, Lisa J., Leung, Jovita T., Foulkes, Lucy, & Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne. (2017). Age-related Differences in Social Influence on Risk Perception Depend on the Direction of Influence. Journal of Adolescence, 60, 53–63, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.07.002.

Knoll, Lisa J., Magis-Weinberg, Lucía, Speekenbrink, Maarten, & Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne (2015). Social Influence on Risk Perception During Adolescence. Psychological Science, 26 (5), 583–592, from doi: 10.1177/0956797615569578.

Komalasari, Gartina & Wahyuni, Eka. (2014). Teori dan Teknik Konseling. Indeks: Jakarta.

Kumru, Asiye, Carlo, Gustavo, Mestre, Maria V & Samper, Paula. (2012). Prosocial Moral Reasoning and Prosocial Behavior Among Turkish and Spanish Adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(2), 205-214, from doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.2.205.

Li Wen-Qiao, Li Liman, Man, Wai, & Li, Ming. (2019). Residential Mobility Reduces Ingroup Favouritism in Prosocial Behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-17, from doi: 10.1111/ajsp.12338.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 19 times
 PDF Downloaded : 10 times

Refbacks



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.