Adaptasi objective key results (OKR) dalam sistem manajemen kinerja birokrasi Indonesia: studi implementasi di kementerian sekretariat negara

  • Nita Wulansari 
    Universitas Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Eko Prasojo
    Universitas Indonesia
    Indonesia

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana Objective Key Results (OKR) diadaptasi dalam sistem manajemen kinerja birokrasi Indonesia melalui studi implementasi dengan desain kualitatif deskriptif di Kementerian Sekretariat Negara. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam dengan pejabat dan pegawai yang terlibat dalam perumusan hingga evaluasi OKR lintas unit serta analisis dokumen kinerja organisasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik interaktif, meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan verifikasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa implementasi OKR di Kementerian Sekretariat Negara berlangsung melalui proses translation institusional yang memastikan kompatibel dengan aturan dan logika birokratis yang sudah mapan. Lima bentuk adaptasi OKR teridentifikasi, yaitu dominasi sasaran committed, KR dominan berbasis aktivitas, transparansi selektif, partisipasi yang menguat pada eksekusi, dan evaluasi kuartalan yang administratif. Proses adaptasi ini membentuk hybridity struktural yang membuat OKR telah berfungsi sebagai penguat mekanisme kinerja, namun belum menghasilkan transformasi substantif pada praktik kerja dan orientasi nilai. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi empiris mengenai dinamika adaptasi inovasi manajerial dalam birokrasi Indonesia serta memperkaya literatur mengenai translation dan hybridity dalam manajemen kinerja sektor publik. Temuan bersifat kontekstual dan tidak dimaksudkan untuk digeneralisasi.

Keywords
  • Objectives key results (OKR)
  • Manajemen kinerja birokrasi
  • Adaptasi institusional
  • Hybridity Studi kualitatif
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Aguinis, H. (2013). Performance management (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
  2. Al-Saadi, Z., Al-Maawali, W., Ali, H. I. H., & Al Rushaidi, I. (2023). The perceived affordances and challenges in the newly introduced OKR-based performance appraisal system in an Omani HEI. SAGE Open, 13(2), https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231179632
  3. Azhar, G. A. (2023). Penyusunan pengukuran kinerja organisasi nirlaba menggunakan pendekatan Objective and Key Results (Studi kasus pada lembaga amil zakat berbasis universitas) [Master’s thesis, Universitas Indonesia]. Universitas Indonesia Library.
  4. Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 58(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/976358
  5. Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the new public sector. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0136
  6. Charoenlarpkul, C., & Tantasanee, S. (2019). A Proposed Employee Development Program from Objectives and Key Results: A Case Study of SG Group of Companies. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 6(2), 133-151. Retrieved from https://assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/odijournal/article/view/3860
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
  8. Criado, J. M., Gutiérrez, G., Garzás, J., Cano, E. L., González de Lena, M. T., & Moguerza, J. M. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of OKRs in enhancing company objectives: A comparative study. IEEE Engineering Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2024.3426327
  9. Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). De Gruyter
  10. den Haak, B. (2021). Moving the needle with lean OKRs: Setting objectives and key results to reach your most ambitious goal. Business Expert Press.
  11. Denis, J.-L., Ferlie, E., & van Gestel, N. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12175
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  13. Doerr, J. (2018). Measure what matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation rock the world with OKRs. Portfolio/Penguin.
  14. Fantozzi, I. C., Di Luozzo, S., & Schiraldi, M. M. (2024). Objective Key Results and their role in modern performance management: A critical analysis of benefits, challenges, and integration with traditional tools. In M. M. Schiraldi et al. (Eds.), Advances in performance management and measurement for industrial applications and emerging domains (pp. 3–10). Springer. Framework. Oxford: Journal Compilation Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59930-9_1
  15. Gomes, P., & Mendes, S. M. (2023). Organizational context, use of performance management practices, and their effects on organizational performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(8), 2478-2495. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2022-0014
  16. Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable, and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003
  17. Kunrath, T. L., Machado, M. P., & Lacerda, D. P. (2022). GOAL-OKR: A framework for strategic focus using Objectives & Key Results and Theory of Constraints. In V. M. López Sánchez et al. (Eds.), Industrial engineering and operations management (pp. 359–371). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14763-0_28
  18. Kementerian PANRB. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 6 Tahun 2022 tentang Pengelolaan Kinerja Pegawai Aparatur Sipil Negara.
  19. Kementerian PANRB. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Jabatan Fungsional.
  20. Kementerian PANRB. (2024). Laporan kinerja Kementerian PANRB 2024.
  21. Kementerian Sekretariat Negara. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Sekretaris Negara Nomor 4 Tahun 2024 tentang Pelaksanaan Pembayaran Tunjangan Kinerja di Lingkungan Kementerian Sekretariat Negara.
  22. LAN. (2021). Kinerja instansi dinilai hasil outputnya bukan serapan anggaran ataupun predikat keuangan. https://lan.go.id/?p=7285
  23. Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. University of California Press.
  24. Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003
  25. Miles, Matthew B & A Michael Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis Second Edition. SAGE Publications.
  26. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
  27. Niven, P. R., & Lamorte, B. (2016). Objectives and key results: Driving focus, alignment, and engagement with OKRs. Wiley.
  28. Rompho, N. (2023). Do Objectives and Key Results solve organizational performance measurement issues? Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2022-0464
  29. Schrøder-Hansen, K., & Hansen, A. (2022). Performance management trends – Reflections on the redesigns big companies have been doing lately. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2021-0391
  30. Stray, V., Gundelsby, J. H., Ulfsnes, R., & Moe, N. B. (2022). How agile teams make objectives and key results (OKRs) work. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes and International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICSSP '22) (pp. 1–6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3529320.3529332
  31. Silva, R., & Santos, G. (2023). Surveying the academic literature in the use of OKR (Objectives and Key Results). In Proceedings of the XIX Brazilian Symposium. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592813.3592934
  32. Tedja, F. W. (2020). PMS: A handbook of modern performance management system. Samahita Wirotama.
  33. Trinkenreich, B., Santos, G., Barcellos, M. P., & Conte, T. (2024). Combining GQM+Strategies and OKR: Preliminary results from a participative case study in industry. UNIRIO, UFES, UFAM. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_7

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 4 times
PDF
: 0 times