Persuasive language strategies in public service advertisements: a pragmatic perspective

  • Hanip Pujiati 
    Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Rizki Perdana
    IKMI College of Informatics and Computer Management
    Indonesia
  • Ade Hilman Maulana
    Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
    Indonesia
  • Lesmana Dwi Putra Yunas
    Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
    Indonesia
  • Aldian Yusup
    Institut Prima Bangsa
    Indonesia

Abstract

Public service advertisements (PSAs) play an important role in conveying social messages to shape people's behavior positively. However, the effectiveness of these messages is highly dependent on the persuasive language strategies used. This study aims to analyze persuasive language strategies in public service advertisements from a pragmatic perspective, focusing on the use of metaphors, repetitions, imperatives, and language styles that are appropriate to the social and cultural context. The method used is an explanatory literature study, which collects and analyzes data from various journal articles, books, and related research reports. Data were collected through documentation studies, then analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach to identify patterns and main themes in persuasive language strategies. The results of the study indicate that the use of metaphors and repetitions consistently increases the emotional appeal and memory of the audience, while the use of imperatives and framing helps strengthen the urgency of the message. This pragmatic approach allows advertisements to adapt messages to the social and cultural values ​​of the community, thereby strengthening the effectiveness of communication. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how language strategies can influence audience perceptions and behavior in the context of public service advertisements, as well as the importance of considering cultural context in designing effective messages.

Keywords
  • Persuasive Language Strategy
  • Public Service Advertisement
  • Pragmatic Perspective
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Adeyinka, I. A. (2012). Persuasive Strategies in the Language of Insurance Advertising in the Print Media in Nigeria.
  2. Afandy, A., Tang, M. R., & Mahmudah, M. (2024). Kajian Simiotika pada Iklan Layanan Masyarakat di Kabupaten Barru Teori Charles Sanders Peirce. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(2), 2018–2028.
  3. Anggapuspa, M. L., Aryanto, H., & Islam, M. A. (2025). Iklan layanan masyarakat tentang bahaya narkoba bagi generasi muda: public service advertisement about the dangers of drugs for the young generation. Jurnal Dimensi Seni Rupa Dan Desain, 21(2), 217–228.
  4. Arman, A., Nurjannah, N., Masri, F. A., Nirmalasari, N., & Mariani, M. (2023). Analisis Gaya Bahasa dalam Iklan Komersil di Kendari. ALFABETA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 6(2), 81–90.
  5. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204.
  6. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
  7. Coppola, V., & Camus, O. (2009). Persuasive communication and advertising efficacy for public health policy: A critical approach. Communication Research, 41.
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
  11. Dibya, I. (2013). Analisis semiotika logo partai nasdem dalam tayangan iklan layanan masyarakat DI MNC TV. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 12(4), 320–337.
  12. Dickey, I. J., & Lewis, W. F. (2011). An overview of digital media and advertising. Handbook of Research on Digital Media and Advertising: User Generated Content Consumption, 1–31.
  13. Fairuza, I., & Dariya, M. (2019). The role of persuasive techniques in public service advertisement. XIX КОЛМОГОРОВСКИЕ ЧТЕНИЯ, 21.
  14. Hagijanto, A. D. (2006). False Campaign dalam Iklan Layanan Masyarakat Paska Kenaikan Harga Bahan Bakar Minyak 1 Oktober 2005. Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual Nirmana, 8(1).
  15. Harahap, A. F., Losi, R. V., Elviani, M., Panggabean, H. M., & Hamdanur, R. (2025). Words That Work: A Thematic Study of Persuasive Language in Online Advertisements. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 4(2), 295–309.
  16. Hoon, L. S., Syihabuddin, S., Sudana, D., & Gunawan, W. (2023). Analisis Multimodal pada Teks Iklan untuk Mengidentifikasi Aspek Ketulusan Iklan. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 303–318.
  17. Komala, R. (2022). Pemanfaatan Teori Image Restoration Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif Di Era Teknologi Digital. Jurnal Ranah Komunikasi (JRK), 6(2), 99–111.
  18. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
  19. Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.
  20. Levinson, S. C. (2011). Universals in pragmatics. In The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences (pp. 654–657). Cambridge University Press.
  21. Makhliyo, S. (2025). Effectiveness of advertising slogans: pragma-communicative and manipulative techniques. Universum: Филология и Искусствоведение, 2(4 (130)), 16–18.
  22. Martins, F. (2024). Effectiveness of Public Service Announcements in Promoting Social Causes. International Journal of Diverse Discourses, 1(1), 31–53.
  23. Miles, H., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
  24. Nababan, M. R., Santosa, R., & Wiratno, T. (2020). A case study of public social advertisements translation: pragmatics approach.
  25. Nwokeocha, I. M. (2023). Effectiveness of Public Service Announcements in Promoting Social Causes. Social Sciences Journal, 91–110.
  26. Paek, H.-J., Hove, T., Ju Jeong, H., & Kim, M. (2011). Peer or expert? The persuasive impact of YouTube public service announcement producers. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 161–188.
  27. Purnamasari, O., Sari, D. A., Swarnawati, A., & Kusmawati, A. (2025). Creating Public Service Announcements to Enhance Social Support for Children with Autism. Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(2), 177–185.
  28. Rohmadi, M. (2013). Tindak Tutur Persuasif dan Provokatif dalam Wacana Spanduk Kampanye Pilkada Jawa Tengah Tahun 2013.
  29. Romanova, I. D., & Smirnova, I. V. (2019). Persuasive techniques in advertising. Training, Language and Culture, 3(2), 55–70.
  30. Roza, A. S. (2021). Pragmatism of Public Service Advertisements: Pragmatic Analysis Appealing and Warning Traffic Police Station of East Lampung.
  31. Rudenko, N. (2017). Pragmatic aspect of english public service advertising. Філологічні Трактати, 9,№ 1, 86–92.
  32. Saelan, R. F. (2025). LKP: Videographer pada Pembuatan Iklan Layanan Masyarakat di Creativepedia Indonesia. Universitas Dinamika.
  33. Savitri, R., & Rahmawati, E. (2023). Analisis makna dalam iklan layanan masyarakat pada akun tiktok@ drrichardlee. UIN Surakarta.
  34. Solihah, D. C. (2025). Peran rsijtv dalam meliterasi hidup sehat di kalangan pasien rumah sakit islam Jakarta Cempaka Putih. Falkultas Dakwah Dan Ilmu Komunikasi.
  35. Sulastri, T. (2023). Ragam bahasa iklan dalam panfuretto osoushiki: konstruksi konsep pemakaman dalam kebudayaan Jepang. Universitas Hasanuddin.
  36. Susanti, R. (2018). Strategi penggunaan bahasa iklan komersial pada media luar ruang di Surakarta (sebuah tinjauan pragmatik).
  37. Tanaka, K. (2005). Advertising language: A pragmatic approach to advertisements in Britain and Japan. Routledge.
  38. Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  39. Webster, J. G. (2018). Audience behavior. Mediated Communication, 7, 91.
  40. Wuryaningrum, R. (2024). Perlokusi Dalam Wacana Pelestarian Maritim: Analisis Risiko Pragmatik. SAWERIGADING, 30(2), 243–254.
  41. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford university press.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 75 times
PDF
: 33 times