Presumption of insolvency under law no. 37/2004: a call for reform to safeguard debtor welfare and social justice
-
Published: September 2, 2025
-
Page: 703-710
Abstract
The Presumption of Insolvency doctrine in Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37/2004 allows debtors to be declared bankrupt if proven to have two creditors and one due debt, without verifying their actual insolvency. Recent data highlights its urgency: the SIPP system recorded 652 PKPU petitions and 94 bankruptcies in 2023, rising from 572 PKPU and 105 bankruptcies in 2022, while PKPU registrations surged from 199 cases in 2016 to 560 in 2023. Such growth indicates increasing reliance on bankruptcy and restructuring mechanisms, particularly affecting small and medium-sized debtors. This study applies a normative legal method with qualitative analysis of 201 court decisions issued between 2010 and 2023. The findings reveal three core issues: (1) procedural inequality from the reverse burden of proof, which disadvantages debtors, (2) socio-economic consequences including the loss of assets, employment, and reputation, and (3) remedial imbalance as the PKPU mechanism often arrives too late. Reform recommendations include establishing differential debt thresholds, introducing a grace period before bankruptcy, requiring social-impact assessments, and strengthening PKPU as the primary restructuring route. These measures are expected to balance creditor certainty with debtor protection while making social justice outcomes measurable through indicators such as recovery rates and access to legal remedies.
- Bankruptcy
- Presumption of Insolvent
- social justice
- debtor protection
- Debtor welfare
- Law No.37/2004
- PKPU
- Normative legal research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Al Kautsar, I., & Muhammad, D. (2021). Investigation the interest of creditor and debtor in suspension of debt payment obligations. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v4i2.5100
- Antara News. (2012). Dirut Telkomsel: Putusan Pailit Tak Pengaruhi Kinerja. https://jatim.antaranews.com/berita/98629/dirut-telkomsel-putusan-pailit-tak-pengaruhi-kinerja
- Anwari, B., Nurmansyah, E., & Naibaho, U. (2024). Year in review: restructuring in Indonesia. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=18886a5b-0bc4-4890-aa23-3cad62568f8b
- Arifuddin, Q., Riswan, R., HR, M. A., Bulkis, B., Latif, A., Salma, S., Hasnawati, H., Hidayat, A. A., & Indah, N. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
- Azizah, N. (2022). Buku Ajar Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB.
- Breuer, W., & Mersmann, K. (2025). Post-bankruptcy performance: A systematic literature review on the performance of U.S. firms after emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5153256
- Budiyono, T. (2021). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Antara Solusi dan Jebakan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.3.2021.232-243
- Candini, T. A., & Alka, R. (2022). Insolvensi Tes Sebagai Dasar Permohonan Pailit Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Gloria Justitia, 2(2), 181–193.
- CRIF Asia. (2025). PKPU Cases in Q4 2024: Growing Challenges for Indonesian Businesses?
- Doshi, H., & Jain, Y. (2021). The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Framework and Principle of Business Efficacy across Different Jurisdictions in the COVID Era. Business Law Review, 45–51.
- Fahamsyah, E., Taniady, V., Saputra, R. D., Rachim, K. V., & Wijaya, G. (2024). The Problem of Filing for Bankruptcy in Indonesian Law: Should the Insolvency Test Mechanism Be Applied? Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukurn Dan Konstitusi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10079
- Faisal, F. (2024). Application for Bankruptcy Declaration or Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation for Developers Viewed from the Principles of Balance and Justice. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(3), 1750–1761.
- Indonesia Business Post. (2023). Domestic bankruptcy laws raises concern as cases surge. https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/1306/Politics/domestic-bankruptcy-laws-raises-concern-as-cases-surge
- Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (2020). https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/IRDA2018
- Khair, A. (2021). Reposition of the value of justice in legal protection of debtors in bankruptcy law politics. The 4th Legal Internasional Conference and Studies, 4(4).
- Kiemas, A., Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Redefining Bankruptcy Law: Incorporating the Principle of Business Continuity for Fair Debt Resolution. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 10–21070. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.996.
- Mantili, R., & Dewi, P. E. T. (2021). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Terkait Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Dalam Kepailitan. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 6(1), 1–19.
- Nyaman, R. S., & Dewi, C. I. D. L. (2023). Prosedur Hukum Permohonan Pailit Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 5(2), 441–455.
- Rahmawati, P., & Rizkianti, W. (2023). Insolvency test sebagai solusi preventif dalam konstruksi hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 10(2), 95–112.
- Saija, R., & Radjawane, P. (2024). Implikasi Hukum Kreditur Menangkal Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Berdasarkan Putusannya Nomor 33/PAILIT/2004/PN. NIAGA.JKT.PST. KANJOLI Business Law Review, 2(2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.47268/kanjoli.v2i2.16295
- Simanjuntak, J. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum atas Kewenangan Kreditor Mengajukan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Honeste Vivere, 33(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v33i1.193
- Simanjuntak, R. (2023). Reformasi Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia: Kepailitan Tidak Didasarkan Pada Insolvency Test. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/reformasi-hukum-kepailitan-indonesia--kepailitan-tidak-didasarkan-pada-insolvency-test-lt64d2137ca3c49?page=all
- Suyudi, A. (2024). Perlunya Pengaturan Kepailitan dan PKPU Khusus untuk UMKM. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perlunya-pengaturan-kepailitan-dan-pkpu-khusus-untuk-umkm-lt6672b3f6abd0a?page=all
- Tan, D. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum: Mengupas dan mengulas metodologi dalam menyelenggarakan penelitian hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463–2478.
- Wan, W. Y. (2022). The Agency Costs of Manager–Creditor and Shareholder–Creditor Relationships in Restructuring. In Court-Supervised Restructuring of Large Distressed Companies in Asia: Law and Policy. Hart Publishing.
- Wiguna, G. (2024). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Insolvensi Dalam Ketentuan Kepailitan Guna Mewujudkan Keberlangsungan Usaha Berbasis Nilai Keadilan Pancasila. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).
- Xynas, L., & Xynas, A. (2021). Insolvency and the Australian Safe Harbour Reforms of 2017–Do They Adequately Support All Australian Directors in Fulfilling Their Role as a Fiduciary of Their Company in 2021? Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 36.
- Yonatan, Y., Sugiri, B., Sukarmi, S., & Sulistio, F. (2023). Selection of Methods of Proving the Inability of Debtors to Pay Debts and the Application of Prejudice Against Misuse of Insolvency Institutions in Insolvency Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(2), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i2.524