Development and evaluation of english instructional materials based on advice poetry to foster students’ moral character and language proficiency

Abstract

Improving the quality of English learning in high schools is an ongoing priority to produce graduates with strong moral character and linguistic competence. This study aimed to develop English teaching materials based on advice poetry and evaluate their effectiveness in enhancing students’ moral character and English language skills. The research employed the Research and Development (R&D) model proposed by Borg & Gall, encompassing preliminary studies, material design, and evaluation phases. The sample consisted of 120 high school students, selected through purposive sampling, who participated in the intervention. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test to measure the statistical significance of learning outcomes before and after the implementation of the developed materials. The findings indicate that the developed teaching materials align with students’ needs, adhere to curriculum standards, and meet criteria for readability, clarity, and graphical presentation. Quantitative analysis revealed a significant improvement in students' learning outcomes, with average scores increasing from 65.4 (pre-test) to 82.7 (post-test) (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.2), indicating a large effect size. Additionally, qualitative feedback showed that students were highly enthusiastic about the learning process, citing increased engagement and understanding of moral values embedded in the advice poetry. This study concludes that (1) the developed teaching materials are effective in improving both moral character and English language competence, and (2) students show positive attitudes toward poetry-based learning. The study recommends that educators incorporate advice poetry into English teaching materials to foster holistic student development. Future research could explore other literary genres or expand the sample size to generalize findings across diverse educational contexts.

References
  1. A. Ibrahim. (2010). Syair dan Perkembangan Keterampilan Berbahasa dalam Pembelajaran Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2010.
  2. Andra, Y. (2019). Naskah Naskah Kuno Di Provinsi Jambi Sebagai Sumber Arkeologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, 9(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v9i2.150
  3. Auwlya, F. (2025). Literature Study: Happiness Learning in Class Using Media of Game-Based Learning. MANDALIKA : Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.56566/mandalika.v3i1.178
  4. Azkia. (2024). Buku Panduan Belajar: Sukses Menghadapi UAS, UN & SPMB. Jakarta: Azkia School.
  5. B. Sutrisno. (2017). Nilai-nilai Karakter dalam Sastra Tradisional Melayu: Analisis Syair-syair Lama. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2017.
  6. Bhandari, I. B. (2023). Context of Poetry Teaching. Academia Research Journal, 2(1), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.3126/academia.v2i1.52357
  7. Buyung, B. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Pengantar Pendidikan di Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Batanghari Jambi. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 20(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v20i1.848
  8. Collie, J. & Slater, S. (1993). Literature in the Language Classroom: A Resource Book of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Collin, J. T. (2001). Bahasa Melayu Klasik: Peranan Syair dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sejarah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, 2001.
  10. Gardner, H. (2016). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. New York: Basic Book, 2016.
  11. Hasibuan, A. L., & S. A. Matondang. (2016). “Revitalisasi Naskah-Naskah Lama Sumatera Utara Sebagai Sumber Nilai-Nilai Edukasi untuk Memperkokoh Ketahanan Moral Bangsa. Medan,” Medan, 2016.
  12. Isyatul Mardhiah. (2024). Analisis Puisi “Malam Berdarah” Karya Ozy V. Alandika Menggunakan Pendekatan Mimetik. PUSTAKA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.56910/pustaka.v5i1.1830
  13. Jumingin, Sulastriningsih, J., & Nurlindasari. (2022). Pengembangan Materi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar, 2022.
  14. Kemendikbud. (2024). Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.”. Https://Hasilun.Puspendik.Kemdikbud.Go.Id.
  15. Kosasih. (2016). Ketatabahasaan dan Kesusastraan: Cermat Berbahasa Indonesia: Untuk SMA/MA SMK. Bandung: Yrama Widya,.
  16. Lazar. (1993). Literature and Language Teaching: A Guide for Teachers and Trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  17. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages Are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  18. M. Ayoub. (1984). The Qur’an and Its Interpreters. New York: State University of New York Press.
  19. McDonald, J. F. (2009). Calibration of a monocentric city model with mixed land use and congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005
  20. Mu’jizah, M. (2020). Kesehatan dan Perobatan Melayu: Sebuah Kearifan Lokal dalam Naskah Pulau Penyengat. Jumantara: Jurnal Manuskrip Nusantara, 11(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.37014/jumantara.v11i1.823
  21. Necula, C. V., Dumulescu, D., & Necula, C. I. (2024). Playing for Good: Exploring the Efficacy of Games and Digital Tools in Prosocial and Moral Education. Educatia 21, 28, 364–374. https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2024.28.40
  22. Pescod, M. (2024). Understanding motivation towards education through exploring the educational experiences of young homeless people. Educational and Child Psychology, 41(3), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2024.41.3.55
  23. Polyak, D. A., Farafontov, M. G., Osadchaya, L. A., & Perevalova, T. V. (2024). Professional development of teachers in the field of digitalization of education. Scientific and Educational Basics in Physical Culture and Sports, 15(3), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.57006/2782-3245-2024-15-3-70-76
  24. Pratiwi, N. P. N. (2022). Upaya Antisipasi Tindak Asusila Di Lingkungan Institusi Pendidikan Formal Menurut Pandangan Agama Hindu. Metta : Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 2(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v2i2.1789
  25. Pusparini, I. (2025). THE USE OF BAHASA INDONESIA IN LEARNING “ENGLISH SPECIAL PURPOSE.” Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v1i1.484
  26. Putra, D. A., & Rullyanti, M. (2023). Investigating Students’ Strategies and Methods in Translating English Text into Indonesian. Journal Of Dehasen Educational Review, 4(02), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.33258/joder.v4i02.4518
  27. Rahimi, M., & Goli, A. (2024). English Learning Achievement and EFL Learners’ Cheating Attitudes and Cheating Behaviors. International Education Studies, 9(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p81
  28. Rosa, N. (2021). “Yang Ditunggu, Ini Hasil Lengkap Asesmen Nasional.
  29. S. D. Krashen. (1982). Principles and Practice Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Porgamon Press, 1982.
  30. Sakkir, G., & Syamsuddin, N. A. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of Duolingo Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in Learning English Vocabulary. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1970
  31. Sanwani. (1994). Ajaran Para Leluhur: Koleksi Perpustakaan Nasional. Jakarta. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional RI, 1994.
  32. Saputri, T., Anam, S., & Munir, A. (2024). Autistic Student Teacher’s Pedagogical Competence in the English Language Teaching. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(3), 715–732. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i3.599
  33. Setiawan, I., Wijanarka, B. S., & Adrianto, R. (2024). Implementation of Discovery Learning to Improve CNC Machining Learning Achievement in Vocational High Schools. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 07(12). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-30
  34. Sibarani, R. (2012). Kearifan lokal: hakikat, peran, dan metode tradisi lisan.
  35. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  36. Suharyadi, & Purwanto. (2014). Statistika Untuk Ekonomi dan Keuangan Modern Edisi 3 Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat,.
  37. Sumaryamti, S. (2023). Inovasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Untuk Mewujudkan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 4(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.36418/jist.v4i1.564
  38. Supriadi. (2017). “Pemanfaatan Sumber Belajar dalam Proses Pembelajaran,” Lantanida, vol. 2, p. 127.
  39. T. Eagleton. (1983). Literary Theory: An Introduction, 1st ed. University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
  40. Taufan, & Muhammad Aminullah. (2025). The Conception of Tasawuf Morals in The Learning Process of Islamic Religious Education. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v7i2.7034
  41. Teeuw. (1996). Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra. Jakarta: Dunia Pustaka Jaya, 1996.
  42. Wairisal, P. L., Sukarma, I. K., Pamungkas, M. I., Harefa, E., Husnita, L., & Nazmi, R. (2025). Teachers Moral Education and Social Competence: Their Influence on Student Character Formation At Madrasah Aliyah Negeri in Padang. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6462