Evaluating the impact of the violence prevention and handling team (TPPK) in reducing bullying and violence in high schools

  • Suhendri Suhendri 
    Universitas PGRI Semarang
    Indonesia
  • Chr. Argo Widiharto
    Universitas PGRI Semarang
    Indonesia
  • Agung Prasetyo
    Universitas PGRI Semarang
    Indonesia
  • Agus Setiawan
    Universitas PGRI Semarang
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study is based on cases of violence in schools which include cases of bullying that still often occur. To overcome violence in schools, the government issued Permendikbudristek number 46 of 2023 concerning the handling of acts of violence in schools. In this regulation, the government requires every school to form a Violence Prevention and Handling Team (TPPK) to reduce the increasing cases of violence in schools. The problem is that since this regulation was issued on August 4, 2023 until February 2024, only 79.39% of schools have formed it. On the other hand, cases of violence in schools still often occur today. The purpose of this study is to determine the correlation between TPPK that has been formed in schools and acts of violence and bullying behavior. The research method used is quantitative correlation to determine the relationship between variables involving three research variables, namely the TPPK variable, the school violence variable and the bullying behavior variable. The population of this study was 1,527 high school students in Semarang who had experienced violence at school or who had been victims of bullying. The sampling technique used was a simple random sampling. The sample of this research was 248 students from 9 public high schools and 10 private high schools in Semarang. Data analysis used the Mann Whitney U Test and simple linear regression supported by IBM SPSS Statistics 25 from Windows software. The results of the study showed that the formation of TPPK was able to minimize acts of violence and bullying behavior in schools. However, the acts of violence and bullying behavior that occurred did not show significant differences in results, both in schools that had formed TPPK and those that had not. These results indicate that the TPPK that has been formed in schools is not fully effective even though it has influenced violent behavior in schools. For this reason, the role of TPPK members still needs to be improved by providing skills training in preventing and handling violence in schools.

Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Alfiyana, N., Dewi, A., & Widyantara, I. (2022). Tinjauan Kriminologi Tindak Kekerasan Bullying di Kalangan Pelajar. Tinjauan Kriminologi Tindak Kekerasan Bullying Di Kalangan Pelajar, 3(2), 269–274.
  2. Analitis, F., Velderman, M. K., Ravens-sieberer, U., Detmar, S., Erhart, M., Herdman, M., Berra, S., Alonso, J., & Rajmil, L. (2015). Being Bullied : Associated Factors in Children and. 123(2), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0323
  3. Anuraga, B. S., Handayami, A., & Rakhmawati, D. (2023). Upaya Peningkatan Pemahaman Pencegahan Penanganan Kekerasan Seksual di Lingkungan SD Negeri 2 Sumur Melalui Tim Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Kekerasan (TPPK). Jurnal Ilmiah, 09, 3998–4014.
  4. Aranditio, S. (2024, August). Kekerasan di Pendidikan, Alasan Tak Semua Pelaku Perundungan Dijerat Hukum. Kompas, 8.
  5. Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2005). Knowledge and Beliefs about Bullying in Schools. School Psychology International, 26(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034305059019
  6. Borualogo, I. S., Wahyudi, H., & Kusdiyati, S. (2020). Prediktor perundungan siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 8(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v8i1.9841
  7. Busch, V., Laninga-Wijnen, L., van Yperen, T. A., Schrijvers, A. J. P., & De Leeuw, J. R. J. (2015). Bidirectional longitudinal associations of perpetration and victimization of peer bullying with psychosocial problems in adolescents: A cross-lagged panel study. School Psychology International, 36(5), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315604018
  8. Cao, Q., Xu, X., Xiang, H., Yang, Y., Peng, P., & Xu, S. (2020). Bullying victimization and suicidal ideation among Chinese left-behind children: Mediating effect of loneliness and moderating effect of gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 111(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104848
  9. Carmey, A. G., & Merrell, K. W. (2001). Bullying in Schools: Perspectives on Understanding and Preventing an International Problem. School Psychology International. http://journals.sagepub.com/home/spi
  10. Craig, W.M., Pepler, D.J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom Full Reference. In School Psychology International (Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp. 22–36). https://doi.org/0803973233
  11. Craig, W., Pepler, D., & Blais, J. (2007). Responding to bullying: What works? School Psychology International, 28(4), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034307084136
  12. Djuwita, R. (2006). “Kekerasan Tersembunyi di Sekolah”: Aspek-aspek psikososial dari bullying. http://www.didplb.or.id
  13. DP3AKB. (2024). Infografis Kekerasan di Jawa Tengah. https://dp3akb.jatengprov.go.id/
  14. Fadhilah, A., & Munjin. (2022). Kekerasan dalam Pendidikan di Sekolah: Bentuk, Sebab, Dampak, dan Solusi. JK: Jurnal Kependidikan, 10(2), 325–344.
  15. Hardiantoro, A., & Hardiyanto, S. (2023, September). Kronologi dan Dugaan Motif Siswa MA di Demak Bacok Leher Sang Guru Artikel ini telah tayang di Kompas.com dengan judul “Kronologi dan Dugaan Motif Siswa MA di Demak Bacok Leher Sang Guru”, Klik untuk baca: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/09/26/07150. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/09/26/071500165
  16. Harris, M. J. (Ed.). (2009). Bullying, Rejection, & Peer Victimization: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Springer Publishing Company.
  17. Kemendikbud. (2024). Tim Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan (TPPK) dan Satuan Tugas Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan (Satuan Tugas) (P. P. Karakter (Ed.)). Kemendikbud. https://merdekadarikekerasan.kemdikbud.go.id/
  18. Kompas. (2024a, February). Guru Wajib Pahami Pencegahan Kekerasan. Kompas, 5.
  19. Kompas. (2024b, February). Perundungan, Sekolah Wajib Bentuk TPPK. Kompas, 5.
  20. Kompas. (2024c, February). Perundungan Prioritas untuk Ditangani. Kompas, 5.
  21. KumparanNews. (2022, April). Survei Kemendikbud: Ada 24,4% Potensi Bullying Terjadi di Sekolah. KumparanNEWS. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/survei-kemendikbud
  22. Marhaely, S., Purwanto, A., Aini, R. N., Asyanti, S. D., Sarjan, W., & Paramita, P. (2024). Literature review: Model edukasi upaya pencegahan bullying untuk sekolah. Jurnal Kesehatan Tambusai, 5(1), 826–834.
  23. Oktasari, D., Yandri, H., & Juliawati, D. (2020). Analisis Pelanggaran Tata Tertib Sekolah Oleh Siswa Dan Peran Guru Bimbingan Dan Konseling Di Sekolah. Jurnal Mahasiswa BK An-Nur, 6(2), 16–21.
  24. Olweus, D. (2001). Bullying at school: Tackling the problem. OECD Observer, 225, 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5
  25. Permendikbudristek No.46/2023. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi No. 46 Tahun 2023 tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan di Lingkungan Satuan Pendidikan. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi RI, 2(5), 1–35.
  26. Putri, R. M., Oktaviani, A. D., Setya, A., Utami, F., Addiina, A., & Nisa, H. (2020). Hubungan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh dan Gangguan Somatoform dengan Tingkat Stres Mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta The Relationship of Distance Learning and Somatoform Disorders with Stress Levels of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Students. 2(1), 38–45.
  27. Rigby, K. (2017). School perspectives on bullying and preventative strategies: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Education, 61(1), 000494411668562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116685622
  28. Salau, T., Keo, G. D., Labre, B., & Fanggitasik, D. D. (2023). Pelatihan Asertif Bagi Remaja: Upaya Preventif Tindakan Kekerasan di Sekolah. Warta LPM, 26(4), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.23917/warta.v26i4.2455
  29. Sanders, Cheryl E and Phye, G. D. (2004). Bullying, Implications for the Classroom. Elsevier Academic Press.
  30. Seal, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and Victimization: Prevalence and Relationship to Gender Level, Ethnicity, Self-Esteem, and Depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735.
  31. Sejiwa. (2008). Bullying: Mengatasi Kekerasan di Sekolah dan Lingkungan Sekitar Anak. Grasindo.
  32. Sheras, P., & Tippins, S. (2002). Your Child: Bully or Victim? Understanding and Ending School Yard Tyranny. A Skylight Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl
  33. Shoham, D. A., Wang, Z., Lindberg, S., Chu, H., Brubaker, L., Brady, S. S., Coyne-Beasley, T., Fitzgerald, C. M., Gahagan, S., Harlow, B. L., Joinson, C., Low, L. K., Markland, A. D., Newman, D. K., Smith, A. L., Stapleton, A., Sutcliffe, S., & Berry, A. (2020). School Toileting Environment, Bullying, and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in a Population of Adolescent and Young Adult Girls: Preventing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Consortium Analysis of Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Urology, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.060
  34. Soegeng, A. (2016). Dasar dasar penelitian Bidang Sosial, Psikologi, dan Pendidikan. Magnum Pustaka Utama.
  35. Sokol, N., Bussey, K., & Rapee, R. M. (2016). Victims ’ Responses to Bullying : The Gap Between Students ’ Evaluations and Reported Responses. School Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-016-9185-0
  36. Steffgen, G., Ewen, N. (2007). Teachers As Victims of School Violence – T He Influence of Strain and School Culture. International Journal, April 2007, 81–93.
  37. Sullivan, K. (2011). The Anti-Bullying Handbook (Second Edi). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://books.google.co.id/books?id
  38. Utomo, A. B., & Yanuar, M. D. (2023). Upaya Identifikasi dan Pencegahan Tindakan Kekerasan di Lingkungan Pendidikan. ABN, 4(1), 56–65.
  39. Wibowo, M. E., Mugiarso, H., Muslikah, Mahfud, A., Hilman, N. S. N., Kunwijaya, I., & Rahmawati, A. H. (2024). Pengembangan Kompetensi Kolaborasi Konselor dalam Setting Layanan TPPK (Tim Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Kekerasan) di Sekolah. Ndonesian Research Journal on Education, 4(4), 452–455.
  40. Widiharto, C. A. (2022). Reduksi Bullying di Sekolah dengan Konsep Karep Suryomentaram. Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, 11(2), 1–12. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jbk/article/view/60834
  41. Widiharto, C. A., Suminar, D. R., & Hendriani, W. (2020). Identification of Victims Response to Bullying Cases: A Study of Javanese Students. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 9(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v9i2.14237
  42. Widiharto, C. A., Yulianti, P. D., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Bullying among Javanese Ethnic Senior High School Students. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6S3), 468–472. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.f1086.0986s319
  43. Yanti, R., Marzoan, & Rahayu, F. (2024). Analisis dampak tppk dalam mewujudkan lingkungan pendidikan yang aman bagi siswa di SDN 3 Sambik Elen. Buana Cakra Faksi, 1(1), 49–60.
  44. Yurtal, F. (2014). Violence in Schools: From the Perspective of Students, Teachers, and Mothers. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(24), 1420–1427. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1979
  45. Zuhriyah, U. (2024, December). Data Kasus Bullying Terbaru 2024, Apakah Meningkat? Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/data-kasus-bullying-terbaru-2024-apakah-meningkat-g621

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 150 times
PDF
: 84 times