Overcoming educational inequity for the urban poor through community-based schools: a case study of gajahwong school in Yogyakarta

Abstract

Education inequality in Indonesia, especially for the urban poor, remains a problem. The poor often do not have adequate access to quality education, which impacts on their opportunities to improve their lives. One approach that can address this issue is through community-based schools, which involve educators, volunteers with a keen interest in education, families and communities in the education process to create a more inclusive and contextualized learning environment. This research aims to explore and understand how Gajahwong School in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, a community-based school, seeks to address educational inequalities for children from poor urban communities. The main focus of this research is to examine the practices, principles and curriculum implemented in the school. This research used a qualitative case study approach to collect data on the implementation of community-based schooling at Gajahwong School. Data were collected through participatory observation and in-depth interviews with one community leader, two school administrators, two teachers and two classroom volunteers. Data collection was conducted for 12 months. The data analysis technique used is thematic analysis, while the research question studied is how the community-based school model at Gajahwong School facilitates children's rights to a good education in addressing educational inequality among children from the urban poor. Analysis also used N-Vivo to support qualitative data analysis. The findings report on  the practices, principles, and curriculum at Gajahwong School. Highlighting the urgency of inclusive and contextual education for children from poor urban communities, the school’s dynamic, contextual, and progressive curriculum is prepared for and based on the context of urban poor communities and children's rights, and is designed to meet children's needs and developmental characteristics. Inclusive and child rights-based education forms the basis of the curriculum which is designed in a thematic way, providing space for each child to develop according to his or her potential.

Keywords
  • School-based community
  • Gajahwong School Yogyakarta
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Pendidikan Volume 12, 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/11/24/54557f7c1bd32f187f3cdab5/statistik-pendidikan 2023.html
  2. Biag, M., & Castrechini, S. (2016). Coordinated strategies to help the whole child: Examining the contributions of full-service community schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 21(3), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2016.1172231
  3. Cole, A. G. (2010). School-community partnerships and community-based education: A case study of a novice program. Perspectives on Urban Education: Education Resources Information Centre. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ894464.pdf
  4. Daniel, J., Quartz, K. H., & Oakes, J. (2019). Teaching in community schools: Creating conditions for deeper learning. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821126
  5. Darling-Hammond, L., & Cook-Harvey, C. M. (2018). Educating the whole child: Improving school climate to support student success. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
  6. Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Williams, K. J. (2019). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (4th ed). United Kingdom: Corwin a SAGE Publishing Company.
  7. Fehrer, K., & Leos-Urbel, J. (2016). “We’re One Team”: Examining community school implementation strategies in Oakland. Education Sciences, 6(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030026
  8. Guha, R., Hyler, M. E., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). The teacher residency: An innovative model for preparing teachers. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
  9. Kemdikbud. (2024). Kemendikbudristek ajak komunitas membangun sekolah yang dicita-citakan. Retrieved from: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan website: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2024/07/ kemendikbudristek-ajak-komunitas-membangun-sekolah-yang-dicitacitakan
  10. Lee, R. E. (2018). Breaking down barriers and building bridges: Transformative practices in community- and school-based urban teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 69, 118–126.
  11. Maier, A., Daniel, J., & Oakes, J. (2017). Community schools as an effective school improvement strategy: A review of the evidence (research brief). Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
  12. Melaville, A., Berg, A. C., & Blank, M. J. (2006). Community-based learning: Engaging students for success and citizenship. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcepartnerships/40.
  13. Oakes, J., Franke, M. L., Quartz, K. H., & Rogers, J. (2002). Research for high-quality urban teaching: Defining it, developing it, assessing it. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 228–234.
  14. Podolsky, A., Kini, T., Bishop, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Solving the teacher shortage: How to attract and retain excellent educators. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from: https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/solving -teacher-shortage
  15. Purnomo, & Solikhah, P. I. (2020). Concept of community-based education in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 529, 674–681.
  16. Sanders, M. G. (2018). Crossing boundaries: A qualitative exploration of relational leadership in three full-service community schools. Teachers College Record, 120(4).
  17. Schuelka, M. J., & Lapham, K. (2019). Comparative and international inclusive education trends, dilemmas, and future directions. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1108s1479-3679201900000370
  18. Setyadi, S. (2022). The role Of government spending in education inequality: Evidence from Indonesia with a panel data analysis. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 1(6), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i6.126
  19. Sulfan & Mahmud, A. (2018)., Konsep masyarakat menurut Murtadha Muthahhari (sebuah kajian filsafat sosial). Jurnal Aqidah-Ta, IV(2).
  20. UU No. 20. (2003). Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional, no. 1. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
  21. Varelas, M., Morales-Doyle, D., Raza, S., Segura, D., Canales, K., & Mitchener, C. (2018). Community organizations’ programming and the development of community science teachers. Science Education, 102, 60–84.
  22. Zeichner, K., Bowman, M., Guillen, L., & Napolitan, K. (2016). Engaging and working in solidarity with local communities in preparing the teachers of their children. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 277–290.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 253 times
PDF
: 103 times