Growing up citizens: mengintegrasikan pendidikan kewarganegaraan dan manajemen peserta didik

  • Nuphanudin Nuphanudin 
    Universitas Negeri Surabaya
    Indonesia
  • Helda Kusuma Wardani
    Universitas Negeri Surabaya
    Indonesia
  • F.X. Gamaliel
    Universitas Negeri Surabaya
    Indonesia
  • Poltjes Pattipeilohy
    Universitas Negeri Surabaya
    Indonesia
  • Aristawidya Salsabila Ansori
    Universitas Negeri Surabaya
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Kristiawan
    Universitas Bengkulu
    Indonesia

Abstract

Elemen penting dari kegiatan politik dan ideologi di perguruan tinggi dan universitas termasuk pengajaran mata kuliah tentang teori politik dan ideologi serta proyek-proyek mahasiswa. Pendidikan ideologi dan politik mahasiswa saat ini menimbulkan sejumlah masalah, seperti pembagian konsep pendidikan, kurangnya alat manajemen, kesenjangan antara teori dan praktik, dan integrasi tim kerja yang buruk dengan keterasingan. Artikel ini mengklasifikasikan komponen-komponen sistem ke dalam tiga dimensi, yakni acceptance, control, dan dissemination untuk menyelidiki bagaimana distribusi informasi mempengaruhi pendidikan kewarganegaraan dan politik. Untuk meningkatkan keefektifan kerja ideologi dan politik di perguruan tinggi dan universitas, makalah ini bertujuan untuk memfasilitasi integrasi yang mendalam antara mata kuliah teori ideologi dan politik dan kerja mahasiswa. Hal ini dicapai dengan mereformasi metode pengajaran dan pendidikan, eksplorasi proaktif mode pengajaran praktis, integrasi mendalam tim pengajar, dan peningkatan mekanisme penanaman yang sedang berlangsung. Penelitian di masa depan yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan integrasi kepemimpinan mahasiswa dan pendidikan kewarganegaraan di perguruan tinggi untuk pengembangan keterampilan generasi berikutnya dapat dipandu oleh model difusi pengetahuan.
References
  1. Alkhateeb, M. A., & Abdalla, R. A. (2021). Factors influencing student satisfaction towards using learning management system moodle. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2021010109
  2. Andolina, M. W., & Conklin, H. G. (2021). Cultivating empathic listening in democratic education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 49(3), 390–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1893240
  3. Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. PS - Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909650300221X
  4. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
  5. Badal, Y. T., & Sungkur, R. K. (2023). Predictive modelling and analytics of students’ grades using machine learning algorithms. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Issue 3). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11299-8
  6. Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789498
  7. Bian, F., & Wang, X. (2023). The effect of big-data on the management of higher education in China and its countermeasures. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 60(1_suppl), 2986–2994. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207209211002076
  8. Breuer, A., Leininger, J., Malerba, D., & Tosun, J. (2023). Integrated policymaking: Institutional designs for implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs). World Development, 170, 106317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106317
  9. Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Bratianu, C., Martínez-Martínez, A., Vătămănescu, E. M., & Dabija, D. C. (2023). Creating civic and public engagement by a proper balance between emotional, rational, and spiritual knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2113–2135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0532
  10. Chen, X. (2022). Design and Dynamic Analysis of Ideological and Political Education Platform Based on Network Multimedia Technology. Advances in Multimedia, 2022, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1364244
  11. Christensen, H. S., Huttunen, J., Malmberg, F., & Silagadze, N. (2023). Unequal inequalities? How participatory inequalities affect democratic legitimacy. European Political Science Review, 15(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000479
  12. D’Apice, H. K., & Bromley, P. (2023). Climate change discourse in U.S. history textbooks from California and Texas. Environmental Education Research, 29(11), 1637–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2206595
  13. Devesh, S., & Nanjundaswamy, A. (2023). Cultivating a culture of inquiry: Exploring the factors influencing the integration of research and teaching in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2023-0227
  14. Dong, J. (2021). Discuss the application research of computer virtual reality technology in college student management. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1915(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1915/4/042048
  15. Fishbein, M., Jaccard, J., Davidson, A. R., Ajzen, I., & Loken, B. (1980). Predicting and understanding family planning behaviors. In I. Ajzen & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
  16. Flanagan, C. A., Cumsille, P., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. S. (2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.421
  17. Fung, A. (2009). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy (1st ed.). Princeton University Press.
  18. Gao, H. W. (2023). Innovation and development of ideological and political education in colleges and universities in the network era. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 60(2_suppl), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207209211013470
  19. Glover, R. W., Lewis, D. C., Meagher, R., & Owens, K. A. (2021). Advocating for Engagement: Do Experiential Learning Courses Boost Civic Engagement? Journal of Political Science Education, 17(S1), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2020.1831932
  20. Gunawan, J., Permatasari, P., & Tilt, C. (2020). Sustainable development goal disclosures: Do they support responsible consumption and production? Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118989
  21. Hannuksela, V. (2024). Explaining the gap: Why do Swedish-speaking minority youth have higher political self-efficacy than Finnish-speaking majority youth? Scandinavian Political Studies, 47(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12265
  22. Hart, D. (2005). The Development of Moral Identity. In G. Carlo, C. P. Edwards, N. Eisenberg, D. Hart, J. Kagan, D. Narvaez, F. C. Power, & E. Staub (Eds.), Moral motivation through the life span (1st ed., pp. 165–196). University of Nebraska Press.
  23. Herrero, J. F., Donoso, F. G., & Vila, R. R. (2023). The first steps for adapting an artificial intelligence emotion expression recognition software for emotional management in the educational context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1939–1963. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13326
  24. Hu, J., & Li, H. (2021). Composition and Optimization of Higher Education Management System Based on Data Mining Technology. Scientific Programming, 2021, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5631685
  25. Huang, H. (2022). Web-based ideological and political education system design and application. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8908755
  26. Junaštíková, J. (2024). Self-regulation of learning in the context of modern technology: A review of empirical studies. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2023-0030
  27. Jung, J., & Gopalan, M. (2024). The Stubborn Unresponsiveness of Youth Voter Turnout to Civic Education: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From State-Mandated Civics Tests. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737231195887
  28. Kahne, J., Hodgin, E., & Eidman-Aadahl, E. (2016). Redesigning Civic Education for the Digital Age: Participatory Politics and the Pursuit of Democratic Engagement. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1132646
  29. Kahne, J., & Middaugh, E. (2009). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school. In Engaging Young People in Civic Life (59; Circle Working Paper 59, Issue February).
  30. Khan, F., Ahmed, W., & Najmi, A. (2019). Understanding consumers’ behavior intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: Perspective of a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142(November 2018), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.020
  31. Kuo, T. H., & Tien, H. K. (2022). Enhancing the effects of creativity training for business school students through art-based methods and blended learning. Education and Training, 64(5), 642–661. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2021-0282
  32. Le, T. U., Johnson, S. K., & Lerner, J. V. (2023). The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree: Longitudinal associations among American adolescents’ civic engagement and family and school characteristics. Applied Developmental Science, 28(3), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2023.2195183
  33. Levine, P. (2006). The Civic Mission of Schools. Knowledge Quest, 34(4), 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650309601997
  34. Li, K., Jing, M., Tao, X., & Duan, Y. (2023). Research on online management system of network ideological and political education of college students. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 60(2_suppl), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720920983704
  35. Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Ali, F. (2022). Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute.’ Service Industries Journal, 42(7–8), 481–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2047941
  36. Lin, A. (2015). Citizenship education in American schools and its role in developing civic engagement: A review of the research. Educational Review, 67(1), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.813440
  37. Ling, Y., Chung, S. J., & Wang, L. (2023). Correction to: Research on the reform of management system of higher vocational education in China based on personality standard (Current Psychology, (2023), 42, 2, (1225-1237), 10.1007/s12144-021-01480-6). Current Psychology, 42(2), 1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02027-5
  38. McFarland, D. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2006). Bowling Young: How Youth Voluntary Associations Influence Adult Political Participation. American Sociolodical Review, 71, 401–425.
  39. Mourtzis, D., Panopoulos, N., & Angelopoulos, J. (2022). A hybrid teaching factory model towards personalized education 4.0. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 36(12), 1739–1759. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2022.2145025
  40. Muñoz, E. G., Parraga-Alava, J., Meza, J., Proaño Morales, J. J., & Ventura, S. (2024). Housing fuzzy recommender system: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26444
  41. Neuman, W. L., & Robson, K. (2009). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (J. Lasser & E. Adams (eds.); 3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
  42. Niewiadomski, R., Anisimova, K., Rodriguez, D., Quiroz, L., Puglisi, S., Ball, C., & Johnson, G. (2024). Civic Education: Insights From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Middle School Students. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231168374
  43. Noack, P., & Eckstein, K. (2023). Populism in youth: Do experiences in school matter? Child Development Perspectives, 17(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12481
  44. Ocheja, P., Flanagan, B., Ogata, H., & Oyelere, S. S. (2023). Visualization of education blockchain data: Trends and challenges. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5970–5994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2026406
  45. Ouyang, S., Zhang, W., Xu, J., Mat Rashid, A., How, S. P., & Bin Hassan, A. (2024). Unmasking the challenges in ideological and political education in China: A thematic review. Heliyon, 10(8), e29176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29176
  46. Pardo-Beneyto, G., & Abellán-López, M. A. (2023). Participatory budgeting for young people as democratic socialisation: An approach to the case of Spain. Children and Society, 37(5), 1555–1575. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12690
  47. Pigola, A., Da Costa, P. R., Ferasso, M., & Cavalcanti da Silva, L. F. (2024). Enhancing cybersecurity capability investments: Evidence from an experiment. Technology in Society, 76(Cc), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102449
  48. Plehwe, D. (2023). Opposition “strategy mobility” – a dimension still missing in the critical policy mobility literature. Critical Policy Studies, 17(4), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2283994
  49. Rong, Z., & Gang, Z. (2021). An artificial intelligence data mining technology based evaluation model of education on political and ideological strategy of students. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 40(2), 3669–3680. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189401
  50. Ruan, X., & Yang, X. (2024). Integrating ideological and political education into curriculum development in the new era: Perspectives from English as a foreign language teaching in Universities of China. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 14(03), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2024.143018
  51. Saadati, Z., Zeki, C. P., & Barenji, R. V. (2023). On the development of blockchain-based learning management system as a metacognitive tool to support self-regulation learning in online higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 3148–3171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1920429
  52. Sangari, S., Dallal, E., & Whitman, M. (2023). Modeling reporting delays in cyber incidents: An industry-level comparison. International Journal of Information Security, 22(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-022-00623-5
  53. Schmid, H., Almog-Bar, M., & Nirel, R. (2024). Donation of Money, Volunteering, and Civic Engagement: How do they Relate to Intergenerational Transmission of Philanthropic Values? Voluntas, 35(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00575-x
  54. Shakeel, M. D., Wolf, P. J., Johnson, A. H., Harris, M. A., & Morris, S. R. (2024). The public purposes of private education: A civic outcomes meta-analysis. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 36, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09874-1
  55. Sharif, S., Rehman, S. U., Ahmad, Z., Albadry, O. M., & Zeeshan, M. (2024). Consumer quality management for beverage food products: Analyzing consumer’ perceptions toward repurchase intention. TQM Journal, 36(2), 431–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2022-0012
  56. Söldner, L., & Paulus, M. (2024). I help, therefore, I am?—longitudinal interrelations of the three-dimensional moral self-concept and prosocial behaviours in 4–6-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12464
  57. Sowula, J. (2024). Mind the gap: Young people and welfare-state related knowledge in deservingness and welfare attitude research. Journal of European Social Policy, 34(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287231222884
  58. van de Wetering, S. (2024). Facilitating citizen participation in marginalised neighbourhoods: Selective empowerment in between vulnerability and active citizenship. Local Government Studies, 50(3), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2023.2218801
  59. Vanello, D. (2024). Moral Identity, Moral Integration, and Autobiographical Narrative. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 0123456789, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-023-00722-9
  60. Verba, S. (2003). Would the Dream of Political Equality Turn out to Be a Nightmare? Perspectives on Politics, 1(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000458
  61. Wang, N. (2021). Ideological and political education recommendation system based on AHP and improved collaborative filtering algorithm. Hindawi Scientific Programming, 2021, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2648352
  62. Wang, W. (2024). Optimization of book information search in intelligent library system management based on cellular network. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 56(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05927-x
  63. Wiȩckowski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2023). Evaluation of football players’ performance based on multi-criteria decision analysis approach and sensitivity analysis. In 1st (Ed.), International Conference on Neural Information Processing (pp. 602–613). Springer Nature Singapore.
  64. Wu, C. (2023). An analysis of the innovation strategy of student management in universities based on big data. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 8(2), 3383–3392. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.00443
  65. Xu, M., & Liu, Y. (2021). Achievement management system for university students based on cloud storage technology. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 20(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2022.119312
  66. Yang, H. (2024). E-learning platforms in ideological and political education at universities: students’ motivation and learning performance. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 628. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05572-2
  67. Yang, H., & Zhang, W. (2022). Data mining in college student education management information system. International Journal of Embedded Systems, 15(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJES.2022.124841
  68. Yang, & Hoskins, B. (2023). Does university participation facilitate young people’s citizenship behaviour in the UK? Cambridge Journal of Education, 53(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2022.2093837
  69. Yunus, S., Mariyudi, M., & Abubakar, M. Bin. (2023). Strategies for optimizing learning activities during the pandemic and new normal. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2175491
  70. Zapko-Willmes, A., & Theocharis, Y. (2024). Accounting for the association between socioeconomic status and youth political participation: A twin family study. Political Psychology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12987
  71. Zhao, M., Liu, W., Saif, A. N. M., Wang, B., Rupa, R. A., Anwarul Islam, K. M., Masudur Rahman, S. M., Hafiz, N., Mostafa, R., & Rahman, M. A. (2023). Blockchain in online learning: A systematic review and bibliographic visualization. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021470
  72. Zhou, J. (2023). Research on visualization platform of university student management under the background of big data. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management, ICMEIM, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-9-2023.2340187
  73. Zhu, L. (2021). Research on the design and application of ideological and political education platform in colleges and universities based on Moodle. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-219141

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 358 times
PDF
: 209 times