Legal and institutional frameworks for managing forest resources: a comparative study of ASEAN countries

  • Rahmad Satria 
    Universitas Panca Bhakti
    Indonesia

Abstract

This article examines the legal and institutional frameworks for managing forest resources across ASEAN countries through a comprehensive literature review methodology. With the increasing pressures of deforestation, climate change, and biodiversity loss, effective forest management has become a critical concern for sustainable development in the region. The study highlights the similarities and differences in legal structures, policies, and institutional arrangements among ASEAN member states, elucidating how these frameworks influence forest conservation and management practices. By analyzing existing research, reports, and legal documents, this study identifies best practices and challenges faced by each country in implementing effective forest governance. Key findings reveal that while some ASEAN countries have established robust legal frameworks and institutional capacities, others struggle with enforcement and coordination among stakeholders. The article emphasizes the importance of regional cooperation and harmonization of policies to enhance forest resource management across the ASEAN bloc. Additionally, it discusses the role of community involvement and indigenous rights in shaping sustainable forest governance. The insights gained from this comparative analysis provide valuable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders aiming to improve forest management practices in the region, ultimately contributing to the sustainable use of forest resources and the achievement of environmental goals.

Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2021). The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In The spectrum of international institutions (pp. 52–91). Routledge.
  2. Abcede Jr, R., & Gera, W. (2018). Examining the coherence of legal frameworks for ecosystem services toward sustainable mineral development in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Ecosystem Services, 29, 228–239.
  3. Adams, M. A. (2020). Analysis of European Union forest Law enforcement, governance, and trade efficacy: A multi-scale perspective. Antioch University.
  4. Ahmadzai, M. R., Zaki, P. H., Ismail, M. H., Bawon, P., & Karam, D. S. (2022). The societal and economic impact of reforestation strategies and policies in Southeast Asia—A review. Forests, 14(1), 1.
  5. Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114.
  6. Cherinet, A., & Lemi, T. (2023). The role of forest ecosystems for carbon sequestration and poverty alleviation in Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2023(1), 3838404.
  7. Cho, S., & Kurtz, J. (2018). Legalizing the ASEAN way: adapting and reimagining the ASEAN investment regime. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 66(2), 233–266.
  8. Dawson, N. M., Coolsaet, B., Sterling, E. J., Loveridge, R., Gross-Camp, N. D., Wongbusarakum, S., Sangha, K. K., Scherl, L. M., Phan, H. P., & Zafra-Calvo, N. (2021). The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecology and Society, 26(3), 19.
  9. Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J. J., & Von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10(9), 3190.
  10. Durugbo, C., & Amankwah‐Amoah, J. (2019). Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1500–1516.
  11. Fan, Y., & Stevenson, M. (2018). A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 205–230.
  12. Guibrunet, L., Gerritsen, P. R. W., Sierra‐Huelsz, J. A., Flores‐Díaz, A. C., García‐Frapolli, E., García‐Serrano, E., Pascual, U., & Balvanera, P. (2021). Beyond participation: How to achieve the recognition of local communities’ value‐systems in conservation? Some insights from Mexico. People and Nature, 3(3), 528–541.
  13. Halimanjaya, A., Belcher, B., & Suryadarma, D. (2018). Getting forest science to policy discourse: a theory-based outcome assessment of a global research programme. International Forestry Review, 20(4), 469–487.
  14. Jayathilake, H. M., Prescott, G. W., Carrasco, L. R., Rao, M., & Symes, W. S. (2021). Drivers of deforestation and degradation for 28 tropical conservation landscapes. Ambio, 50(1), 215–228.
  15. Jeon, S., Sarker, P. K., & Giessen, L. (2019). The forest policies of ASEAN and Montréal process: Comparing highly and weakly formalized regional regimes. Forests, 10(10), 929.
  16. Kasymov, U., Wang, X., Zikos, D., Chopan, M., & Ibele, B. (2022). Institutional barriers to sustainable forest management: Evidence from an experimental study in Tajikistan. Ecological Economics, 193, 107276.
  17. Kenney-Lazar, M., & Mark, S. (2021). Variegated transitions: Emerging forms of land and resource capitalism in Laos and Myanmar. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(2), 296–314.
  18. Kiri, M., Rith, V., & Sothy, C. (2024). Sustainable Forest Management Practices in Tropical Asia: A Review. Journal of Selvicoltura Asean, 1(4), 157–166.
  19. Kraft, M. E. (2021). Environmental policy and politics. Routledge.
  20. Magni, G. (2017). Indigenous knowledge and implications for the sustainable development agenda. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 437–447.
  21. NKUSSA, A. (2024). Analyses of Factors Contributing To Delays in Crime Investigations by Tanzania Police. IAA.
  22. Oldekop, J. A., Rasmussen, L. V., Agrawal, A., Bebbington, A. J., Meyfroidt, P., Bengston, D. N., Blackman, A., Brooks, S., Davidson-Hunt, I., & Davies, P. (2020). Forest-linked livelihoods in a globalized world. Nature Plants, 6(12), 1400–1407.
  23. Ostrom, E. (2019). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In Theories of the Policy Process, Second Edition (pp. 21–64). Routledge.
  24. Rahman-Shepherd, A., Evaborhene, N. A., Berman, A., Amaya, A. B., Boro, E., Dar, O., Ho, Z. J. M., Jung, A.-S., Khan, M., & Mohamed-Ahmed, O. (2025). Establishing the value of regional cooperation and a critical role for regional organisations in managing future health emergencies. The Lancet Global Health, 13(3), e585–e592.
  25. Riggs, R. A., Langston, J. D., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Lim, H. S., Sari, D. A., Sururi, Y., & Sayer, J. (2018). Governance challenges in an Eastern Indonesian forest landscape. Sustainability, 10(1), 169.
  26. Stupak, I., Lattimore, B., Titus, B. D., & Smith, C. T. (2011). Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest fuel production and harvesting: a review of current standards for sustainable forest management. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(8), 3287–3308.
  27. Swamy, L., Drazen, E., Johnson, W. R., & Bukoski, J. J. (2018). The future of tropical forests under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 37(2), 221–256.
  28. Tegegne, Y. T., Cramm, M., & Van Brusselen, J. (2018). Sustainable forest management, FLEGT, and REDD+: exploring interlinkages to strengthen forest policy coherence. Sustainability, 10(12), 4841.
  29. Tun, K. M. (2019). Challenges and opportunities of tourism development in myanmar among CLMV countries (Cambodia, Lao Pdr, Myanmar, Vietnam)(Khine Myintzu Tun, 2019). MERAL Portal.
  30. Varkkey, H., Tyson, A., & Choiruzzad, S. A. B. (2018). Palm oil intensification and expansion in Indonesia and Malaysia: Environmental and socio-political factors influencing policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 92, 148–159.
  31. Wei, S., Xiang, Y., & Li, Z. (2024). Balancing Conservation and Development: A Policy Framework for Sustainable Forest Management. Journal of Selvicoltura Asean, 1(4), 187–197.

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 601 times
PDF
: 352 times