The effect of a learning approach based on experience and prior knowledge on the mastery of the concept of static fluids

Nadrah Nadrah(1),
(1) Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/168700

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The development of science and technology in the world of education today has dominated the development of other sciences. Science is the study of natural phenomena. These natural phenomena can occur at any time without being realized by humans. This study aims to determine the difference in concept mastery between students who are taught with an experiential learning approach and students who are taught using a conventional approach to class XI Science at SMA Negeri 2 Makassar in the 2020/2021 academic year, to determine the differences in conceptual mastery between students who have high and low initial knowledge. This research is a type of quasi-experimental research (quasi-experimental), involving two groups, namely the experimental group and the control gro up. The data analysis carried out is descriptive and inferential analysis to examine the proposed hypothesis. The conclusion of this study is that there are significant differences in concept mastery between students who are taught using an experiential learning approach (PBP), there are significant differences in conceptual mastery among students who have high prior knowledge and there is an interaction between the learning approach and prior knowledge of mastery of students' physics concepts.

Keywords


Learning Influence Experience Fluid concept Learners

References


Astuti, I. A. D., Dasmo, D., Nurullaeli, N., & Rangka, I. B. (2018). The impact of pocket mobile learning to improve critical thinking skills in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1), 12030.

Bhakti, Y. B., Astuti, I. A. D., Okyranida, I. Y., Asih, D. A. S., Marhento, G., Leonard, L., & Yusro, A. C. (2020). Integrated STEM project based learning implementation to improve student science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1464(1), 12016.

Bolger, M. S., Kobiela, M., Weinberg, P. J., & Lehrer, R. (2012). Children’s mechanistic reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(2), 170–206.

Hermansyah, H., Nurhairunnisah, N., Sentaya, I. M., Sulindra, I. G. M., Andriani, N., & Gunawan, G. (2021). The Effect of Physics Virtual Experiments on Mastery Concept Based on Students Learning Style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 12079.

Jamaludin, J., & Batlolona, J. R. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Physics on the Topic of Static Fluids. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 6–13.

Khan, T. A., & Zhao, X. (2021). Perceptions of students for a gamification approach: cities skylines as a pedagogical tool in urban planning education. Conference on E-Business, e-Services and e-Society, 763–773.

Krist, C., Schwarz, C. V, & Reiser, B. J. (2019). Identifying essential epistemic heuristics for guiding mechanistic reasoning in science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 160–205.

Kusairi, S., Alfad, H., & Zulaikah, S. (2017). Development of web-based intelligent tutoring (iTutor) to help students learn fluid statics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 1–11.

Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2003). Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedes’ principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 71(11), 1178–1187.

Mahmudovna, R. D. (2021). Introducing innovations in The Preschool Education System With Talented Children. Middle European Scientific Bulletin, 8.

Makhrus, M., Abtokhi, A., & Hidayatullah, Z. (2021). Learning Case Study in the Pandemic Covid-19: Learning Targets, Needs Analysis, Obstacles, and Solutions. International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Social Science (ICONETOS 2020), 788–793.

Meylasari, N. D., Sujadi, I., & Subanti, S. (2021). The profile of 8th graders’ level of statistical thinking: A case of analyzing and interpreting data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 12052.

Michelini, M., & Stefanel, A. (2019). Innovation in physics teaching/learning for the formative success in introductory physics for bio area degrees: the case of fluids. In Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society (pp. 153–168). Springer.

Mirzaei, A., Webster, C. M., & Siuki, H. (2021). Exploring brand purpose dimensions for non-profit organizations. Journal of Brand Management, 28(2), 186–198.

Palau, R., Fuentes, M., Mogas, J., & Cebrián, G. (2021). Analysis of the implementation of teaching and learning processes at Catalan schools during the Covid-19 lockdown. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 183–199.

Putra, P. D. A., & Iqbal, M. (2014). Implementation of digital comic to improve creative thinking ability in integrated science study. Interaction, 4, 3.

Qhobela, M., & Moru, E. K. (2020). Understanding the Use of Classroom Talk by Newly Trained Physics Teachers in Lesotho. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(1), 81–91.

Renatovna, A. G., & Renatovna, A. S. (2021). Pedagogical and psychological conditions of preparing students for social relations on the basis of the development of critical thinking. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 4889–4902.

Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Shin, J. W., Rood, J. E., Hupalowska, A., Regev, A., & Heyn, H. (2021). Building a high-quality human cell atlas. Nature Biotechnology, 39(2), 149–153.

Shoiynbayeva, G. T., Shokanov, A. K., Sydykova, Z. K., Sugirbekova, A. K., & Kurbanbekov, B. A. (2021). Methodological foundations of teaching nanotechnology when training future physics teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100970.

Sundari, P. D., Dewi, W. S., Saputra, D., & Hidayat, R. (2021). The Improvement of Physics Teachers’ Competence in Developing an Interactive Recitation Programs to Remediate Students’ Misconception. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 242–252.

Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892.

Toh, P. C., & Kaur, B. (2016). Developing 21st Century Competencies In The Mathematics Classroom: Yearbook 2016, Association Of Mathematics Educators. World Scientific.

Vakaliuk, T. A., Spirin, O. M., Lobanchykova, N. M., Martseva, L. A., Novitska, I. V, & Kontsedailo, V. V. (2021). Features of distance learning of cloud technologies for the organization educational process in quarantine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1), 12051.

Yadaeni, A., Kusairi, S., & Parno, P. (2018). Penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan proses sains siswa kelas XII pada materi fluida statis. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(3), 357–364.

Zacharia, Z. C., & De Jong, T. (2014). The effects on students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits of introducing virtual manipulatives within a physical manipulatives-oriented curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 32(2), 101–158.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 404 times
 PDF Downloaded : 59 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.