The erosion of well-being in the digital age: a moderated mediation model of moral disengagement, internet addiction, and social support in adolescents

  • Fandy Achmad Yunian
    Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
    Indonesia
  • Nuraeni .Nuraeni 
    Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
    Indonesia
  • Mohd Nazri Abdul Rahman
    Universiti Malaya
    Malaysia
  • Mahdi Anbari
    Universiti Malaya
    Malaysia

Abstract

The increase in adolescents’ digital activity poses serious psychological risks, as moral disengagement and internet addiction have the potential to erode adolescents’ well-being. This study examines a mediation-moderation model to understand the influence of moral disengagement on subjective well-being, with internet addiction as the mediator and social support as the moderator. Involving 271 high school students in Purwokerto selected through cluster random sampling, the data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results reveal a complex dynamic: although moral disengagement has a significant direct positive effect on subjective well-being suggesting a short-term defense mechanism to avoid internal moral sanctions this well-being is illusory. This is evidenced by the mediating role of internet addiction, which attenuates this positive effect; moral disengagement serves as a strong predictor of addictive behavior, which ultimately significantly reduces subjective well-being. Furthermore, the moderation hypothesis was rejected; social support failed to mitigate the negative impact of moral disengagement. Additional findings indicate that moral disengagement is negatively correlated with social support, suggesting the occurrence of a resource loss spiral in which immoral behavior erodes the social support that should serve as a protective buffer. Therefore, interventions for adolescent well-being cannot rely solely on strengthening external social support which has proven vulnerable to moral degradation but must prioritize moral cognitive restructuring and digital ethics literacy to break the cycle of addiction and prevent social isolation.

Keywords
  • Subjective well being
  • Moral disengagement
  • Internet addiction
  • Social support
  • Adolescent psychology
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Adeline, A., & Basaria, D. (2025). Peran smartphone addiction terhadap subjective well-being pada remaja di Jakarta. 14(2), 1–11.
  2. Amir, F. Z., Saberi, H., & Bashardoust, S. (2022). The relationship between moral disengagement and spiritual well- being in the students of Tehran universities with the mediating role of positive and negative affects. Social Determinants of Health, 8(1), 1–9.
  3. Amjad, N., & Skinner, M. (2008). Normative Beliefs about Aggression and Retaliation : Association with Aggressive Behaviour and Anticipatory Self-censure. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 18(1), 2008.
  4. APJII. (2025). Survei penetrasi internet dan perilaku penggunaan internet 2025.
  5. Atmaja, K., & Kiswantomo, H. (2020). Hubungan antara Komponen - Komponen Subjective - Well Being dan Internet Addiction. Humanitas, 4(1), 27–42.
  6. Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Pscychologist, 44, 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2002.1033040
  7. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
  8. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral Disengagement In The Perpetration Of Inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(1999), 193–209.
  9. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 1–26. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&%2338;AN=4369846&%2338;site=ehost-live
  10. Bandura, A. (2011). A Social Cognitive perspective on Positive Psychology. International Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347411794078444
  11. Bandura, A. (2012). Moral Disengagement.
  12. Bandura, A. (2016). Moral Disengagement How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. Worth Publishers Macmillan Learning.
  13. Banyumas, R. (2021). Siswa SMP Meninggal Dunia Karena Kecanduan Game Online, RSUD Banyumas: Gangguan Karena Game Masuk Klasifikasi. https://radarbanyumas.disway.id/read/16782/siswa-smp-meninggal-dunia-karena-kecanduan-game-online-rsud-banyumas-gangguan-karena-game-masuk-klasifikasi#goog_rewarded
  14. Borualogo, I. S. (2025). Original Research Article Artikel Penelitian Orisinal The Subjective Well-Being of Indonesian Children : Exploring Emotional and Cognitive Dimensions [ Kesejahteraan Subjektif Anak Indonesia : Eksplorasi Dimensi Emosional dan Kognitif ]. 40(2), 1–35.
  15. Brajša-Žganec, A., Lipovcan, L. K., & Hanzec, I. (2015). The relationship between social support and subjective well-being across the lifespan.
  16. Cheng, X., & Lin, H. (2023). Mechanisms from Academic Stress to Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Adolescents : The Roles of Academic Burnout and Internet Addiction. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1578. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S423336
  17. CNN, I. (2021). Survei: 19,3 Persen Anak Indonesia Kecanduan Internet. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20211002135419-255-702502/survei-193-persen-anak-indonesia-kecanduan-internet#:~:text=Sebuah survei menunjukkan bahwa lebih,Sabtu (2/10).
  18. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. . (1985). (1985). Stress, social support and buffering hypothesis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 16(1), 20–31.
  19. Colella, G. M., Palermiti, A. L., Bartolo, M. G., Servidio, R. C., & Costabile, A. (2024). Problematic Social Media Use , Retaliation , and Moral Disengagement in Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization Among Italian Preadolescents : A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Bullying Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-024-00265-2
  20. Davis, R. A. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8
  21. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. 95(3), 542–575.
  22. Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2008). Subjective well-being : a general overview. Psychological Society of South Africa., 39(4), 391–406.
  23. Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where millennials end and post-millennials begin.
  24. Dong, X., & Geng, L. (2023). Nature deficit and mental health among adolescents : A perspectives of conservation of resources theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87(September 2022), 101995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101995
  25. Donoso, G., Casas, F., Rubio, A., & Cespedes, C. (2021). Mediation of Problematic Use in the Relationship Between Types of Internet Use and Subjective Well- Being in Schoolchildren. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641178
  26. Ghozali, I. (2021). SMARTPLS 3.2.9 : Partial Least Squares, Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi untuk penelitian empiris (3rd ed.). BP UNDIP.
  27. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9036-7
  28. Gülaçti, F. (2010). The effect of perceived social support on subjective well-being. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3844–3849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.602
  29. Guo, Q., Guo, Y., Qiao, X., Leng, J., & Lv, Y. (2020). Chance locus of control predicts moral disengagement which decreases well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, June, 110489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110489
  30. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) in Second Language and Education Research: Guidelines Using an Applied Example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  31. Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(August 2019), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
  32. Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.10008574
  33. Hasibuan, N. S., Salmiyati, Lestari, Y. I., & Mukhlis. (2023). Moral Disengagement and Cyberbullying among Adolescent Social Media Users : Do Gender Differences Exist ? 5(2), 70–77.
  34. Health, C. for R. (2022). I-NAMHS: Indonesia – National Adolescent Mental Health Survey.
  35. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of Resources A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. 44(3), 513–524.
  36. Hockey, G. R. J. (2011). A Motivational Control Theory of Cognitive Fatigue. 167–187.
  37. Hoyle, R. H., & Gottfredson, N. C. (2014). Sample Size Considerations in Prevention Research Applications of Multilevel Modeling and Structural Equation Modeling. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0489-8
  38. Hsu, M., Chang, C., & Wu, S. (2020). RE-examining the E ff ect of Online Social Support on Subjective Well-Being : The Moderating Role of Experience.
  39. Huang, L., & Zhang, T. (2022). Perceived Social Support , Psychological Capital , and Subjective Well-Being among College Students in the Context of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00608-3
  40. Kim, J., & Haridakis, P. M. (2009). The Role of Internet User Characteristics and Motives in Explaining Three Dimensions of. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14, 988–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01478.x
  41. King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., Griffiths, M. D., & Gradisar, M. (2012). Cognitive-Behavioral Approaches to Outpatient Treatment of Internet Addiction in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(11), 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21918
  42. Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Binder, J. F. (2013). Computers in Human Behavior Internet addiction in students : Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 959–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024
  43. Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. (2000). Social Support Theory and Measurement. Social Support Measurement and Intervention, January 2000, 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.003.0002
  44. Laraswati, R., & Moesarofah. (2025). Pengaruh Moral Disengagement terhadap Perilaku Cyber Aggression pada Peserta Didik. Jurnal Konseling Indonesia ( JKI ), 10(1), 22–28.
  45. Li, H., Guo, Q., & Hu, P. (2023). Moral disengagement , self-control and callous-unemotional traits as predictors of cyberbullying : a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychology, 1–11.
  46. Li, Q., Tan, Y., Chen, Y., Li, C., Ma, X., Wang, L., & Gu, C. (2022). Is Self-Control an ‘“Angel”’ or a ‘“Devil”’? The Effect of Internet Game Disorder on Adolescent Subjective Well-Being. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY,BEHAVIOR, AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 25(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0044
  47. Liu, W., Mei, J., Tian, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Age and Gender Differences in the Relation Between in School Among Students. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0873-1
  48. Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: Development of the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10004
  49. Merdeka. (2018). Kecanduan game online, 10 Anak di Banyumas alami gangguan mental. https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/kecanduan-game-online-10-anak-di-banyumas-alami-gangguan-mental.html
  50. Oliveira, J., Pedras, S., Inman, R. A., & Ramalho, S. M. (2024). Latent profiles of emotion regulation among university students : links to repetitive negative thinking , internet addiction , and subjective wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, April, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1272643
  51. Purwaningtyas, F. D., & Mardiyanti, R. (2021). Gambaran Subjective Well Being pada Individu Ditinjau dari Intensitas Bermain Game Online. PSIKOSTUDIA, 10(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia
  52. Regina, G. R., & Suminar, D. R. (2016). PEngaruh moral disengagement terhadap recreation cyber- aggression pada emerging adults pengguna media sosial instagram. Buletin Riset Psikologi Dan Kesehatan Mental, X, 1–10.
  53. Sarbini, S., Tahrir, T., Hambali, A., & Sudirman, D. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Moral Disengagement Siswa SMA di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v6i2.6249
  54. Sejati, P. P. (2021). Bocah 12 Tahun di Banyumas Meninggal, Diduga Alami Gangguan Kesehatan Akibat Kecanduan Game Online Artikel ini telah tayang di TribunBanyumas.com dengan judul Bocah 12 Tahun di Banyumas Meninggal, Diduga Alami Gangguan Kesehatan Akibat Kecanduan Game Onli. https://banyumas.tribunnews.com/2021/05/26/bocah-12-tahun-di-banyumas-meninggal-diduga-alami-gangguan-kesehatan-akibat-kecanduan-game-online?page=2&s=paging_new.
  55. She, R., Wong, K., Lin, J., Leung, K., Zhang, Y., & Yang, X. (2021). How COVID-19 stress related to schooling and online learning affects adolescent depression and Internet gaming disorder : Testing Conservation of Resources theory with sex difference. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00069
  56. Shen, Y., Sun, X., & Xin, T. (2019). How Social Support Affects Moral Disengagement : the Role of Anger And Hostility. Social Behavior and Personality an International Journal, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7720
  57. Shirkhani, S., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Barriers to self-regulation of language learning : Drawing on Bandura’s Idea. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.213
  58. Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. ALFABETA.
  59. UNICEF. (2017). Perundungan di indonesia: Fakta-Fakta Kunci, Solusi dan Rekomendasi.
  60. Wang, J., Xu, X., Wu, Q., Zhou, C., & Yang, G. (2024). The mediating effect of subject well-being between physical activity and the internet addiction of college students in China during the COVID-19 pandemic : a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychology, April, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368199
  61. Wang, X., Wang, S., & Zeng, X. (2023). Does Sensation Seeking Lead to Adolescents ’ Cyberbullying Perpetration ? The Does Sensation Seeking Lead to Adolescents ’ Cyberbullying Perpetration ? The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement and The Moderating Role of Perceived Social Support. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, April. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-023-01527-8
  62. Weinstein, A., Feder, L. C., Rosenberg, K. P., & Dannon, P. (2014). Internet Addiction Disorder: Overview and Controversies Aviv. In Behavioral Addictions: Criteria, Evidence, and Treatment (pp. 99–117). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407724-9.00005-7
  63. Wu, B., Liu, T., & Tian, B. (2023). How does social media use impact subjective well-being ? Examining the suppressing role of Internet addiction and the moderating effect of digital skills. Frontiers in Psychology, February, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1108692
  64. Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Shi, L. (2023). Defender self ‑ efficacy and moral disengagement on social support and bystander behaviors among primary school students : a multilevel moderated mediation model. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00253-3
  65. Wutsqo, B. U., Hanim, W., & Wahyuni, E. (2023). Gambaran kecanduan internet pada remaja. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 531–536.
  66. Xiao, W., & Cheng, M. (2023). The Relationship between Internet Addiction and Cyberbullying Perpetration : A Moderated Mediation Model of Moral Disengagement and Internet Literacy. Tech Science Press. https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2023.042976
  67. Xu, X., Xu, Y., Zhao, J., Ye, P., Yu, M., Lai, Y., Wang, J., Huang, Q., Wang, J., & Huang, Q. (2022). Good Personality and Subjective Well-Being : Presence of Meaning in Life and Perceived Social Support as Mediators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
  68. Yamin, S. (2021). Seri Ebook Statistk Olah Data Statistik: SMARTPLS 3 SMARTPLS 4 AMOS & STATA [Mudah & Praktis] (A. Rasyid (ed.)). PT Dewangga Energi Internasional.
  69. Young, K. (2015). Internet Addiction (C. Montag & M. Reuter (eds.)). Springer International Publishing.
  70. Young, K. S. (2007). Cognitive behavior therapy with internet addicts: Treatment outcomes and implications. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(5), 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9971
  71. Zewude, G. T., Oo, T. Z., Gabriella, J., & Jozsa, K. (2024). The Relationship among Internet Addiction , Moral Potency , Mindfulness , and Psychological Capital. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education., 1735–1756.
  72. Zhao, H., Zhang, H., He, W., & Chen, N. (2020). Subjective well-being and moral disengagement in Chinese youths : The mediating role of malicious envy and the moderating role of Honesty – Humility. Children and Youth Services Review, 119(100), 105655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105655

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 89 times
PDF
: 53 times