Gender differences in nonviolence disposition among university students

  • Ardian Renata Manuardi 
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Uman Suherman
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Ilfiandra Ilfiandra
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Yusi Riska Yustiana
    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study was conducted in response to the increasing concern over aggressive behaviors among university students, highlighting the importance of understanding factors associated with nonviolent tendencies. This study aimed to examine gender differences in nonviolence disposition among university students. A comparative quantitative research design with a cross-sectional approach was employed. The participants consisted of 430 undergraduate students from IKIP Siliwangi, Indonesia, including 83 male students and 347 female students, aged 17–21 years. Data were collected through an online survey using an adapted version of the Teenage Nonviolence Test (TNT). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent samples t-test. The results indicated that the overall nonviolence disposition of students was at a moderate level across all dimensions, based on the scale used in this study. Descriptive findings showed that female students consistently obtained higher mean scores than male students in nearly all dimensions. Inferential analysis revealed a statistically significant gender difference in Physical Nonviolence, with female students demonstrating higher levels than male students. This finding indicates that gender is associated with differences in students’ tendencies to reject physical aggression and refrain from using physical force in conflict situations.

Keywords
  • Nonviolence Disposition
  • Gender Differences
  • Physical Nonviolence
  • University Students
  • Comparative Study
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Achuo, E. D., & Dinga, G. D. (2024). Exploring the nature, causes and consequences of school-based violence in Cameroon. International Journal of Educational Development, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103080
  2. Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., Ilyas, A., Fikri, M., Syahputra, Y., & Hariyani, H. (2019). An Analysis of Phubbing Behaviour: Preliminary research from counseling perspective. 1st International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018). Atlantis Press, 295, 270–273. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetep-18.2019.65
  3. Ahiruddin, A., Ega, E. R. E., & Rosada, R. (2025). The Influence of Self-Control on Phubbing Behavior among Vocational High School Students in West Jakarta. JITSS (Journal of Innovation and Trend in Social Sciences), 2(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.63203/jitss.v2i2.128
  4. Alonso-Rodríguez, I., Pérez-Jorge, D., Pérez-Pérez, I., & Olmos-Raya, E. (2025). Restorative practices in reducing school violence: a systematic review of positive impacts on emotional wellbeing. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1520137
  5. Andrzejewski, J., Baltodano, M. P., & Symcox, L. (2009). Social justice, peace, and environmental education: Transformative standards. Routledge.
  6. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
  7. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives: Second Edition. Anchor Book. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357
  8. Bettencourt, B., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(3), 422.
  9. Bondestam, F., & Lundqvist, M. (2020). Sexual harassment in higher education–a systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1729833
  10. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859.
  11. Dodge, K. A. (2006). Translational science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 18(3), 791–814.
  12. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: a meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330.
  13. Elder, W. B., Domino, J. L., Mata-Galán, E. L., & Kilmartin, C. (2017). Masculinity as an avoidance symptom of posttraumatic stress. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18(3), 198.
  14. Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305.
  15. Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Sage.
  16. Gannon, S. (2015). Rethinking school violence: theory, gender, context. Taylor & Francis.
  17. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.
  18. Goss-Sampson, M. (2018). Statistical Analysis in JASP 0.9.2: A Guide for Students. Version 2. University of Greenwich.
  19. Gouwy, M. C., Bostyn, D. H., De Clercq, B., & Roets, A. (2025). The Development of a Moral Compass: Exploring Age and Gender Differences in Moral Foundations In Early and Mid-Adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 97(5), 1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12500
  20. Gulledge, L. M., Sellers, C. S., & Cochran, J. K. (2023). Self-control and intimate partner violence: does gender matter? Deviant Behavior, 44(5), 785–804.
  21. Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398.
  22. Ifdil, I., Fadli, R. P., Syahputra, Y., Erwinda, L., Zola, N., & Afdal, A. (2018). Rasch stacking analysis: differences in student resilience in terms of gender. Konselor, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/0201873101379-0-00
  23. Kartadinata, S. (2020). Bimbingan dan konseling komprehensif abad 21: Visi kedamaian dalam kehidupan nyata. UPI Press.
  24. Khoirunnisa, K., Nani Al Muin, Caroline Lisa Setia Wati, & Erwinda, L. (2025). Navigating Identity: The Role of Self-Regulation and Meaning of Life in Adolescents. Journal of Counseling and Educational Research, 2(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.63203/jcerch.v2i1.362
  25. Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2020). Gandhi and the Psychology of Nonviolence, Volume 2. Springer.
  26. Kool, V. K., & Agrawal, R. (2022). Milgram’s Lost Gandhi: Whither Gandhi’s Wisdom of Nonviolence in the Psychology of Wisdom. In Gandhi’s Wisdom: Insights from the Founding Father of Modern Psychology in the East (pp. 25–49). Springer.
  27. Krause, J. (2019). Gender dimensions of (non) violence in communal conflict: The case of Jos, Nigeria. Comparative Political Studies, 52(10), 1466–1499.
  28. Maharani, K. W., & Eluemuno, A. I. (2025). The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Narcissistic Tendencies Among Students. JITSS (Journal of Innovation and Trend in Social Sciences), 1(3), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.63203/jitss.v1i3.118
  29. Mahmoud, G. N. M., Ahmed, N., Aboserea, M. M., & Ghaith, R. F. A. (2024). Exploring Nonviolent Communication and Empathy in the University Environment: A Qualitative Study. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 53(02), 4013–4042. https://doi.org/10.48047/w5g31070
  30. Mayton, D. (2009). Nonviolence and Peace Psychology. Springer.
  31. Mayton, D. M., Nogle, K. S., Mack, J. L., Maxcy, R. T., Weeks, R. G., Hamilton, D. L., Morton, C. M., Mineshita, T., & Nawata, A. (1998). Teenage Nonviolence Test: A new measure of nonviolence. Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
  32. Morrell, R., Bhana, D., & Hamlall, V. (2012). Rethinking School Violence: Theory, Gender, Context. Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Nesterova, Y., Kim, E. J. A., & Amaglo-Mensah, T. D. (2022). The purposes of education in peacebuilding: Views of local peace actors in diverse (post-)conflict societies. Global Change, Peace and Security, 34(2–3), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2024.2382679
  34. Normalasari, C., Biju Thomas, S., Nazri Abdul Rahman, M., & Syahputra, Y. (2025). Relational Aggression vs. Well-Being: Uncovering the Impact of Relational Harm Among Adolescents. JITSS (Journal of Innovation and Trend in Social Sciences), 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63203/jitss.v2i1.194
  35. Nusantara, W. T. D., & Syahputra, Y. (2025). The Relationship Between Self-Control and Tendencies Towards Narcissistic Behaviour in Teenagers Using Social Media TikTok. Journal of Counseling and Educational Research, 1(3), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.63203/jcerch.v1i3.158
  36. O’Dea, C. J., Jardin, E., & Saucier, D. A. (2022). The masculinity-based model of Aggressive Retaliation in Society (MARS). Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 23(2), 160.
  37. Oktasari, M., Stevani, H., Wahyudin, H., Fijriani, F., Dwi Ariyanto, R., & Hoi-yung, L. (2025). Exploring Gender Based Differences in Resilience Among Indonesian University Students Through Rasch Model. Journal of Counseling and Educational Research, 2(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.63203/jcerch.v2i2.414
  38. Putri, R. S. A., Rini, A. P., & Ariyanto, E. A. (2024). Self regulation dan kecenderungan adiksi media sosial pada santri: bagaimana peran fear of missing out sebagai mediator? Sukma : Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 5(2), 212–222.
  39. Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution. Polity Press.
  40. Romero, A., Blanch, A., Martínez, A., & Malas, O. (2024). Empathy, personality, and aggression in male and female adolescents. Current Psychology, 43(43), 33160–33169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06859-9
  41. Rosenberg, M. B. (2015). Nonviolent communication: A language of life. PuddleDancer Press.
  42. Salomon, G. (2002). The nature of peace education: Not all programs are created equal. Peace Education: The Concept, Principles, and Practices around the World, 296, 3–13.
  43. Saltmarsh, S., Robinson, K. H., & Davies, C. (2012). Rethinking school violence: Theory, gender, context. Palgrave Macmillan.
  44. Sandjaja, S. S., & Aliffia, N. (2025). The Effect of Emotional Maturity on Self Harm Behavior in Adolescent. JITSS (Journal of Innovation and Trend in Social Sciences), 2(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.63203/jitss.v2i2.402
  45. Sitarov, V., Maralov, V., & Romanyuk, L. (2019). Technology for formation of the ability of non-violent interaction among students. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2911–2918. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.392
  46. Standish, K., Devere, H., Suazo, A., & Rafferty, R. (2022). The Palgrave handbook of positive peace. Springer.
  47. Syahputra, Y., Rahmat, C. P., & Erwinda, L. (2025). Instrumentasi Tes dalam Bimbingan dan Konseling. CV Eureka Media Aksara.
  48. Syahputra, Y., Solihatun, S., Hafni, M., Miswanto, M., Asbi, A., Fajri, N., Putri Karisma, S., Prasiska Rahmat, C., & Erwinda, L. (2024). Digital Dynamics: Investigating the Correlation between Social Media Addiction and Students’ Relational Aggression. Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 6(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.51214/00202406843000
  49. Tight, M. (2023). Bullying in higher education: an endemic problem? Tertiary Education and Management, 29(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-023-09124-z

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 60 times
PDF
: 35 times