Developing a 4F model-based self-reflection tool for deep learning in upper elementary students

  • Nina Wirdiyana 
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia
  • Supianto
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia
  • Jenny Indrastoeti
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia
  • Siti Poerwanti
    Universitas Sebelas Maret
    Indonesia

Abstract

Self-reflection in elementary learning is often unstructured and lacks standardized tools aligned with deep learning principles. This study developed a self-reflection instrument based on the 4F model (fact, feeling, finding, future) using the 4D development framework (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). Data were collected through field studies, interviews, and observations. Instrument construction included content validation (Aiken’s V), construct validation (CFA), and reliability testing (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.717). Findings showed most of the 227 students demonstrated “good” or “fair” self-reflection abilities. The instrument is valid, reliable, and supports teachers in evaluating students’ reflective thinking. The novelty lies in integrating the 4F model within a deep learning context for elementary education. Broader application and external validation are recommended for future research.

Keywords
  • Self-reflection
  • Assesment Instrument
  • Elementary Schools
  • Upper Grades
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Adjii, K. (2019). Instrumen Penilaian Kedisiplinan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Assessment and Research on Education, 1(1), 1–10.
  2. Anam, F., Muharlisiani, L. T., Soewardini, H. M. D., & Purnomo, A. (2023). Reflections on 4F Model Learning for Professionalism Development of Prospective Teachers: Evidence from Teacher Professional Education. Journal of Education Research, 4(4), 2498–2510. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.740
  3. Anshari, M. I., Nasution, R., Irsyad, M., Alifa, A. Z., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2024). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal Sumatif Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran PAI. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 964–975. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5931
  4. Baharum, H., Ismail, A., Awang, Z., McKenna, L., Ibrahim, R., Mohamed, Z., & Hassan, N. H. (2023). The study adapted instruments based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to validate measurement models of latent constructs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2860.
  5. Bailey, K., & Jakicic, C. (2023). Common Formative Assessment: A Toolkit for Professional Learning Communities at Work® Second Edition (Harness the power of common formative assessment to nurture student engagement and achievement). Solution Tree Press.
  6. Barthakur, A., Joksimovic, S., Kovanovic, V., Richey, M., & Pardo, A. (2022). Aligning objectives with assessment in online courses: Integrating learning analytics and measurement theory. Computers & Education, 190, 104603.
  7. Cahyadi, M. M. (2025). Modifikasi Skala Self-Efficacy: Analisis EFA dan CFA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 14(01), 76–81.
  8. Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2021). Reflection Literacy: A Multilevel Perspective on the Challenges of Using Reflections in Higher Education Through a Comprehensive Literature Review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100376
  9. Chen, X. (2025). Implementing E-assessment for Learning in Primary EFL Writing: A Case Study in China. Springer Nature.
  10. Day, D. V. (2024). Developmental Systems. In Developing Leaders and Leadership: Principles, Practices, and Processes (pp. 25–56). Springer.
  11. Dekker, W. (2023). Self-Regulated Learning for Chinese, Adult Language Learners: An Intervention Study in a Blended Learning Environment.
  12. Dwijonagoro, S. H., Wulandari, A., & Audiya, F. R. (2024). Permasalahan pendidikan dan solusinya di indonesia. BAKSOOKA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sejarah, Sosial Dan Budaya, 3(01).
  13. Greenaway, R. (1992). Reviewing by Doing. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership, 9, 21–25.
  14. Iskandar, R. C., Aldriani, S. N. F., Anjani, A. G., Iswara, B., & Fahmi, Y. El. (2023). Refleksi Pembelajaran dalam Rangka Menyiapkan Pendidikan di Era 5.0. PEMBELAJAR: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 114–121.
  15. Johan, J. R., Iriani, T., & Maulana, A. (2023). Penerapan Model Four-D dalam Pengembangan Media Video Keterampilan Mengajar Kelompok Kecil dan Perorangan. Jurnal Pendidikan West Science, 01(06), 372–378.
  16. Kaloeti, P. P., & Dewi, S. P. (2020). Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori Konsep Water Sensitive City pada Kawasan Permukiman dii Kecamatan Banyumanik. Jurnal Permukiman, 15(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.31815/jp.2020.15.84-94
  17. Kandasamy, I., Kandasamy, W. B. V., Obbineni, J. M., & Smarandache, F. (2019). Indeterminate Likert Scale: Feedback Based on Neutrosophy, its Distance Measures and Clustering Algorithm. Soft Computing, 24(10), 7459–7468.
  18. Kurni, M., & KG, S. (2024). Critical Thinking Using IoT for Learning. In The Internet of Educational Things: Enhancing Students’ Engagement and Learning Performance (pp. 189–207). Springer.
  19. Liu, C.-C., Liu, S.-J., Hwang, G.-J., Tu, Y.-F., Wang, Y., & Wang, N. (2023). Engaging EFL students’ critical thinking tendency and in-depth reflection in technology-based writing contexts: A peer assessment-incorporated automatic evaluation approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 13027–13052.
  20. Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2023). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 905.
  21. Mardapi, D. (2020). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Parama.
  22. Mesra, R., Salem, V. E. T., Polii, M. G. M., Santie, Y. D. A., Wisudariani, N. M. R., Sarwandi, S., Sari, R. P., Yulianti, R., Nasar, A., Yenita, Y. D., & Santiari, N. P. L. (2023). Research & Development dalam Pendidikan. In Https://Doi.Org/10.31219/Osf.Io/D6Wck. Sumatera Utara: PT. Mifandi Mandiri Digital.
  23. Michael, C., & Ginting Munthe, R. (2024). Pentingnya Faktor - Faktor Demografi Sebagai Determinan Entrepreneur Attitude Dalam Melakukan Seleksi Kandidat Mitra Ojek Online (Survei Pada Mitra Ojek Online Gojek). Sanskara Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(03), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.58812/sek.v2i03.284
  24. Mistiani, W., Istiyono, E., Syamsudin, A., & Ghazali, N. H. M. (2024). Developing a Pancasila Students’ Character Instrument: Proof of Construct Validity and Estimation of Construct Reliability. REID (Research and Evaluation in Eduaction), 10(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i2.44920
  25. Mohammadi Zenouzagh, Z., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2025). Empowering students’ agentive engagement through formative assessment in online learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 9.
  26. Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197.
  27. Ramadhan, M. F., Siroj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Validitas and Reliabilitas. Journal on Education, 6(2), 10967–10975. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.4885
  28. Ramezani, S. G., & Mostafavi, Z. S. (2025). Developing and validating a comprehensive scale for accreditation standards and quality assurance in e-learning institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 1–49.
  29. Rohmad, R., & Sarah, S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Angket. Yogyakarta: Penerbit K-Media.
  30. Ruangsan, W. (2025). Empowering Educators Through Reflective Practice: A Meta-Model for Transformative Teacher Development in the 21st Century. วารสาร วิชาการ สังคมศาสตร์ สมัยใหม่ (Online), 2(2), 1–22.
  31. Sirya, Z. A., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2024). Validity of Misconception Test Instrument Using Four-Tier True-False Test in Plant Tissue Structure and Function Material. BioEdu: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 022–029.
  32. Sureshchandar, G. S. (2023). Quality 4.0–a measurement model using the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(1), 280–303.
  33. Tarigan, M., & Fadillah, F. (2021). Uji Validitas Konstruk Tes Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children (WISC). Jurnal Studia Insania, 9(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.18592/jsi.v9i2.5599
  34. Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Develoment for Traning Teacher of Exeptional Children: A Sourcebook (p. 194).
  35. Wahyudi, W., Kusuma, D., & Winanto, A. (2025). Desain Baru Model Manajemen Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Asik-Kritis-Kreatif-Bermakna untuk Mewujudkan Pembelajaran Mendalam di Sekolah. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 15(2), 190–207.
  36. Waruwu, M. (2024). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D): Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(2), 1220–1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2141
  37. Wilkinson, D. (2024). Formative Assessment Activities That Engage Students and Support Success. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 24(1).
  38. Zhou, Q., & Zhang, H. (2025). Flipped classroom teaching and ARCS motivation model: Impact on college students’ deep learning. Education Sciences, 15(4), 517.

Downloads

Pdf

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 89 times
Pdf
: 30 times