Augmented reality-based stem learning to enhance elementary school students' higher-order thinking skills

  • Chairan Zibar L. Parisu
    Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara
    Indonesia
  • Aspin Aspin
    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
    Indonesia
  • Asharif Suleman 
    UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of AR-assisted science learning with a STEM approach in improving students' HOTS compared to conventional learning. The method used was a quasi-experimental design with a Pretest–Posttest Control Group involving two classes: an experimental class (AR-STEM) and a control class (conventional). The instruments consisted of a HOTS test (domains C4–C6), an engagement observation sheet, and a student response questionnaire. The results showed an average HOTS posttest score of 82.23 for the experimental class compared to 67.09 for the control class; The average N-Gain value in the experimental class was 0.64 (medium-high category according to learning criteria), while the control class was 0.36 (medium-low category). The independent samples t-test showed a significant difference in the posttest score and N-Gain (p < 0.001). This quantitative finding is supported by very positive student responses (average > 3.50) in the aspects of media attractiveness, ease of use, learning engagement, and perception of HOTS improvement. Interpretation of the results: the increase in N-Gain from 0.36 to 0.64 in the experimental group indicates a meaningful learning change, namely an increase in higher-order thinking skills in a range of effects that are practically substantial, not just statistically significant. The highly significant difference (p < 0.001) strengthens the finding that the integration of AR with the STEM approach not only increases engagement, but also encourages the development of students' analytical, evaluation, and creative skills more effectively than conventional methods. These findings are consistent with the idea that AR provides visual representations and real interactions for exploring scientific phenomena, while the STEM approach structures activities that require critical thinking and integrated problem-solving—a complementary combination to build HOTS. In conclusion, AR-STEM learning is an effective and contextual strategic alternative to increase HOTS, engagement, and learning motivation in science learning, and is relevant to the demands of the Independent Curriculum.

Keywords
  • Augmented Reality
  • Science Learning
  • HOTS
  • STEM
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Aboud, Y. Z., & Alhayek, K. (2025). The effectiveness of using augmented reality technology in science education to enhance creative thinking skills among gifted eighth-grade students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), EM2644. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16416
  2. Al-Ansi, A. M., Jaboob, M. J., Garad, A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532
  3. Ateş, H., & Polat, M. (2025). Leveraging augmented reality and gamification for enhanced self-regulation in science education. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13481-0
  4. Atmojo, S., et al. (2021). Utilizing augmented reality for natural science learning in elementary school: A case study. (Cited in Lampropoulos, 2024).
  5. Augmented reality (AR) as an educational tool: Transforming teaching and learning. (2025). Information, 16(5), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050372
  6. Augmented Reality-Oriented Natural Science Materials. (2023). Indonesian Journal of Elementary Education. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJEE/article/view/60618
  7. Abubakar, A., & Aspin, R. (2025). Peran kepemimpinan berbasis AI dalam meningkatkan pembelajaran sains pada siswa kelas rendah: Studi kasus di SDN 2 Lebo. Jurnal Kepemimpinan dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 45–56.
  8. Bakar, A., Aspin, R., Marwan, A., Herwanto, E., & Prihatmojo, D. (2025). The impact of visionary leadership on science-based technology adoption in East Wawonii elementary schools. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(3), 3459–3470. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.6299
  9. Chang, H.-Y., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2024). Development of a mobile learning network for science with augmented reality and its impact on literacy and numeracy. IJIRSS, 7(2), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i2.3292
  10. Efendi, E., & Asrizal. (2025). Research trends and opportunities in integrating augmented reality and deep learning into science education. JPPIPA, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11988
  11. Erlangga, R., Mukhlis, M., Wihardi, Y., & Raflesia, R. (2024). Augmented reality in STEM using personalized learning. ComEngApp Journal, 13(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.18495/comengapp.v13i2.473
  12. Erlina, W., Putri, D., Wiyono, R., & Nurdin, H. (2022). The effect of augmented reality on cognitive load and conceptual understanding in stereochemistry. JRST, 59(4), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09957-0
  13. Gestiardi, R., et al. (2023). Augmented reality needs analysis in science learning. Jurnal Al-Ishlah. https://journal.staihubbulwathan.id/index.php/alishlah/article/view/935
  14. Hardianti, H. (2025). Implementation of augmented reality in science education. International Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijit.vxix.xxxx
  15. Hayuana, D., Suwono, H., & Setiowati, R. (2023). Effectiveness of PBL STEM to improve problem solving. Bioedukasi, 21(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v21i2.39740
  16. Hidayat, M., & Wardat, Y. (2023). Systematic review of augmented reality in STEM education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 9257–9282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x
  17. Hidayat, N., Rahman, A., & Setyasto, D. (2024). The role of augmented reality in transforming STEM education. JPSI, 12(2), 145–158.
  18. Ishengoma, E., Ngeze, L., & Ndibalema, P. (2024). Augmented reality applications in STEM education. IJOIT, 12(11), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.6025/ijoit/2024/12/1/45-58
  19. Khalsa, D. S., Afzal, S., & Rahman, M. (2023). Augmented reality in STEM education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11203–11225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x
  20. Kurniawan, A., Jumadi, J., Kuswanto, H., & Inayah Syar, N. (2024). Transforming science learning through augmented reality: A systematic review. EduScience, 11(3).
  21. Kusumaningrum, H., Hayat, N., & Sumarno, T. (2025). Meta-analysis: AR effectiveness for critical thinking. JPPIPA, 11(5), 1203–1212. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.11071
  22. Lampropoulos, G. (2024). Teaching natural sciences using AR. AMLER, 4(1), 1021–1037. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.013
  23. Lin, X.-F., Wong, S. Y., Zhou, W., Shen, W., Li, W.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2023). Cognitive load in AR-assisted science learning. IJSME, 22, 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10376-9
  24. Narulita, N., Sari, Y., & Fatayan, A. (2024). AR-based IPA–IPS ecoliteracy module. JIPP, 8(3), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v8i3.85805
  25. Prananta, A. W., Biroli, A., & Afifudin, M. (2024). AR for science learning: Systematic review. JPPIPA, 10(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10iSpecialIssue.8099
  26. Prananta, A. W., & Biroli, A. (2024). Integration of AR in science classrooms. JPSI, 12(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpsi.v12i1.8811
  27. Rahman, T. A., & Setyasto, N. (2025). AR-assisted e-learning in circulatory system. JPPIPA, 11(2), 1079–1092. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10318
  28. Sahronih, S., Hanim, W., & Rachmadtullah, R. (2025). AR-based STEM approach on problem-solving. JMSCE, 5(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.20527/jmscedu.v4i2.14410
  29. Sakdiah, H., Andriani, R., Ginting, F. W., & Fatmi, N. (2023). Development of AR media integrated with STEM. JPPIPA, 9(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.6043
  30. Sugiri, W. A., Priatmoko, S., Amelia, R., Wibowo, A. M., & Rahmawati, I. N. (2025). Students’ conceptual understanding using AR. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology Education, 1(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.47836/pp.1.2.028
  31. Nugroho, I. A., & Suleman, M. A. (2025). Integration Internet of Things (IoT) and ChatGPT in the teaching of photosynthesis and water quality at SDN 2 Lebo. JPPIPA, 11(7), 844–853. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.12156
  32. Sulistyanto, R., Nugroho, A., & Handayani, D. (2025). Evaluation of augmented reality in developing HOTS. IJIET, 15(9), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.9.2402
  33. Tene, T., Marcatoma, J. A., Palacios Robalino, M. de L., Mendoza Salazar, M. J., Vacacela Gomez, C., & Bellucci, S. (2024). Integrating immersive technologies with STEM. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1410163. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1410163
  34. TEM Journal Ed. (2025). Augmented reality as a teaching tool: A meta-analysis. TEM Journal, 2271–2284. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM43-14-05
  35. Utami, D., & Rusnilawati. (2025). AR-based discovery learning to improve critical thinking. Lectura, 16(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v16i1.25775
  36. Urrahmah, S., Tasrif, E., Delianti, V. I., & Mursyida, L. (2025). AR-based learning media and conceptual understanding. JAVIT, 5(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.24036/javit.v5i1.239
  37. Velarde-Camaqui, D., Celaya-Ramírez, R., Contreras-Fuentes, Y., Sanabria-Z, J., & Bellucci, S. (2024). Enhancing STEAM education through AR. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1391803. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1391803
  38. Wang, X.-M., Yu, D.-D., Yu, X.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Li, F. (2024). Impacts of AR-supported STEM education: Meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 20547–20585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12641-y
  39. Yuniarti, N., Rahmawati, Y., Anwar, M., Gusti Al Hakim, V., Hidayat, H., Hariyanto, D., & Fauziah Husna, A. (2024). AR-based HOTS media in vocational teacher education. European Journal of Education, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12725
  40. Zhang, S., & Yao, Z. (2025). Challenges of AR application in science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00123-1
  41. Zhang, Y., & Miguel, J. (2024). Systematic review of AR in STEM education. Information, 15(9), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090515
  42. Zufahmi, R., Rohman, A., & Sari, N. (2025). Augmented reality in science learning: A systematic review. JPBI, 11(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v11i1.38570

Downloads

Pdf

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 102 times
Pdf
: 59 times