Analisis kebutuhan: bumper videos interaktif etnografis dengan pendekatan gamifikasi di sekolah dasar

  • Dewinta Aulia Savitri 
    Universitas Sriwijaya
    Indonesia
  • Aswasulasikin Aswasulasikin
    Universitas Sriwijaya
    Indonesia
  • Makmum Raharjo
    Universitas Sriwijaya
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the needs for developing ethnographic bumper videos based on gamification in Natural and Social Science (IPAS) learning at the elementary school level. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed involving 12 teachers and 324 students from three elementary schools in Palembang. The instrument was constructed based on six main aspects pedagogical, technical, cognitive, aesthetic, socio-cultural, and evaluative integrated across four components: students, teachers, media, and instructional design. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires, then analyzed using percentage techniques and Spearman’s rank correlation. The findings revealed that all aspects were in the high to very high category, with strong positive correlations (rs = 0.67–0.78) between school-based learning needs and home learning activities. Cognitive and aesthetic aspects emerged as the dominant needs, emphasizing the importance of visually engaging designs that enhance information processing efficiency. These results affirm that multidimensional needs analysis is essential for developing digital learning media that are contextual, adaptive, and aligned with the Merdeka Curriculum, contributing to effective and culturally relevant learning experiences.

Keywords
  • Bumper videos
  • Interaktif
  • Etnografis
  • Gamifikasi
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Abdalla, M., & Moussa, A. (2024). Culturally responsive teaching in digital classrooms: Bridging values and engagement. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 18(2), 105–119.
  2. Aini, R., Sari, W., & Nugraha, D. (2023). Digital literacy practices and teacher readiness in hybrid learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 55–68.
  3. Akram, M., Farooq, M., & Hussain, T. (2022). Home learning environments and digital readiness in post-pandemic education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6159–6178.
  4. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
  5. Çelik, H., & Baturay, M. H. (2024). Contextualizing learning through local culture: Evidence from digital ethnographic pedagogy. Educational Technology & Society, 27(3), 44–58.
  6. Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2011). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials (2nd ed.). Pfeiffer.
  7. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
  8. Falah, N., Nurbayan, Y., & Utomo, W. (2025). Implementation of project-based learning in Kurikulum Merdeka: Student engagement perspective. Indonesian Journal of Education, 11(1), 33–49.
  9. Hakim, L., & Radiana, D. (2023). TPACK competence development among secondary school teachers. Journal of Instructional Media, 16(2), 74–86.
  10. Hayaturrohmah, N., Wulandari, T., & Rahmawati, D. (2025). Formative assessment and reflective learning in digital instructional design. Journal of Educational Assessment, 22(4), 210–225.
  11. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  12. Huang, X., & Qiu, L. (2023). Technology-enhanced formative assessment and metacognitive growth in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 195, 104719.
  13. Jiménez Sierra, L., Pérez, J., & Gómez, R. (2023). Teachers as learning designers: Redefining facilitation in digital classrooms. Journal of Modern Education, 15(3), 201–218.
  14. Kangas, M., & Siklander, P. (2025). Promoting self-regulated learning through playful pedagogy in post-pandemic education. Learning and Instruction, 89, 102725.
  15. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2023). What is TPACK? Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge in modern education. Computers & Education, 191, 104637.
  16. Komara, E. (2022). The role of interactive media in supporting hybrid learning models. Journal of Educational Development, 7(3), 188–197.
  17. Li, S., Zhang, J., & Zhao, L. (2024). Teacher orchestration of multimodal representation in digital classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107685.
  18. Ljubojević, M., Vuković, D., & Stanković, N. (2025). Reflective teaching practices and feedback literacy in formative assessment. European Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 275–290.
  19. Liu, Q., Lin, J., & Wang, P. (2023). Students’ expectations toward interactive digital media in blended learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 1241–1259.
  20. Luthfiyah, A., Setiawan, D., & Hidayat, N. (2025). Digital readiness and student engagement in multimedia-based learning. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 27(1), 45–59.
  21. Mayer, R. E. (2024). Multimedia learning (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  22. Nurhasanah, Y., Hidayati, S., & Pratama, D. (2020). Integrating local culture in learning materials to enhance student engagement. Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 150–164.
  23. Picasso, R. (2024). Developing metacognitive awareness through formative assessment in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 75–93.
  24. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
  25. Ponte, M., López, D., & Castro, J. (2023). Designing accessible e-learning platforms for secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1884–1899.
  26. Putra, A., & Afrina, E. (2023). Local narratives in digital media for improving student motivation. Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(2), 62–78.
  27. Rahman, M. (2025). Integrative instructional design for culturally contextualized learning. Journal of Instructional Development, 18(1), 41–60.
  28. Rogo, Y., & Radiana, D. (2024). Teacher adaptation and feedback design in blended learning ecosystems. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 15(4), 315–330.
  29. Sailer, M., Homner, L., & Reiners, T. (2024). Gamification and motivation in digital education: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 199, 104838.
  30. Stark, K. (2024). Cognitive load and multimedia processing in student learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 301–325.
  31. Sutarto, H., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). Sociocultural influences on students’ learning engagement: The role of home environment. Indonesian Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(1), 17–31.
  32. Tahiri, R. (2025). Student-centered learning approaches and reflective pedagogy in Merdeka Curriculum implementation. International Journal of Education and Learning, 14(1), 88–101.
  33. UNESCO-IBE. (2024). Learning in a changing world: Home and school as integrated systems. UNESCO Institute for Education.
  34. Vorobyeva, N., Petrova, L., & Makarov, I. (2023). Ecological models of home-school learning continuity. Educational Studies, 57(4), 405–424.
  35. Wiguna, A. (2025). Integrating local wisdom in digital learning: A case study in Indonesian secondary schools. Journal of Educational Culture and Values, 12(1), 55–67.
  36. Yuniarsih, T., & Setiawan, R. (2025). Visual communication design for learning motivation enhancement. Jurnal Desain Edukasi, 11(1), 99–113.
  37. Zhao, H., & Ren, Y. (2025). Aesthetic engagement and learning motivation: The mediating role of emotional design in multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 198, 104821.
  38. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 11 times
PDF
: 5 times