Academics’ resistance to online learning during COVID-19, its antecedents and consequences: Lesson learned for the impacts on work-related outcomes

  • Rindi Ardika Melsalasa Sahputri 
    Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung
    Indonesia
  • Martina Purwaning Diah
    Department of Public Administration, Universitas Brawijaya
    Indonesia
  • Naila Kamaliya
    Department of Psychology, Universitas Brawijaya
    Indonesia
  • Septiana Sihombing
    Department Information and Business, Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung
    Indonesia
  • Sujarwoto Sujarwoto
    Indonesia
  • Dia Agustia Salsabila
    Department Information and Business, Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung
    Indonesia

Abstract

COVID-19 has resulted in a global shift toward online education. Rapid and unprecedented change resulted in organisational unreadiness and resistance to change. As a learning organisation, academia is expected to adapt swiftly to disruptive change; however, evidence mapping the outcomes of such change—particularly how resistance to change affects academic performance—remains limited, especially given the drastic shift in teaching delivery caused by the pandemic. This study thus aims to understand the impact of education institution management when organising change on lecturers' resistance and its implication for lecturers’ work-related outcomes (i.e., lecturer commitment, satisfaction, and performance). The instrument was a Google Forms questionnaire using Oreg's attitude toward change scale. Explanatory sequential mixed method design combining quantitative survey methodologies with a cross-sectional design and narrative analysis were used in this study. This study used convenience sampling which included one hundred and fifty-one lecturers from fifteen public universities in Indonesia. Partial least squares modelling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the quantitative analysis and thematic analysis was used to classify the qualitative finding. The results found that change-related information and intrinsic reward significantly affect lecturers’ resistance behaviour. Every component of resistance behaviour is also associated with lecturers’ commitment to organisation, satisfaction, and performance. This study contributes to fulfilling the research gap by providing evidence on how academics' or lecturers' responses to drastic change and its implication on their performance.

Keywords
  • Resistance to change
  • Change process
  • Online learning
  • Academic organisation
  • Work-related outcomes
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Acharjya, B., & Das, S. (2021). Adoption of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 17(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.20220301.oa4
  2. Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi-Structured Interviews. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492–505). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19
  3. Al-Alawi, A. I., Abdulmohsen, M., Al-Malki, F. M., & Mehrotra, A. (2019). Investigating the barriers to change management in public sector educational institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(1), 112–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2018-0115
  4. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
  5. Bailey, F., Kavani, A., Johnson, J. D., Eppard, J., & Johnson, H. (2022). Changing the narrative on COVID-19: Shifting mindsets and teaching practices in higher education. Policy Futures in Education, 20(4), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211055189
  6. Bdair, I. A. (2021). Nursing students’ and faculty members’ perspectives about online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(3), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.02.008
  7. Biggane, J. E., Allen, D. G., Amis, J., Fugate, M., & Steinbauer, R. (2017). Cognitive Appraisal as a Mechanism Linking Negative Organizational Shocks and Intentions to Leave. Journal of Change Management, 17(3), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2016.1219379
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  9. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  10. Dolighan, T., & Owen, M. (2021). Teacher efficacy for online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brock Education Journal, 30(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v30i1.851
  11. Dunn, A. H. (2018). Leaving a Profession after It’s Left You: Teachers’ Public Resignation Letters as Resistance Amidst Neoliberalism. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 120(9), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000906
  12. EFSA, E. F. S. A., Ab Halim, N. A. A., Chang, C.-T. T., Chan, H. K., Hassali, M. A., Nouri, A., Abbas, M., Raza, S. H., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Alaghbari, M. A., Abegaz, W. E., Grossman, Z., Wolday, D., Ram, D., Kaplan, J., Sibide, K., Wuhib, T., Ismael, S., Nkengasong, J., … Zhang, W. (2020). Information technology and resistance to public sector reforms: A case study in Kenya. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Advances in Education in Diverse Communities, 8(1), 1–276. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647241
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  14. Fischer, S., Hyder, S., & Walker, A. (2020). The effect of employee affective and cognitive trust in leadership on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitment: Meta-analytic findings and implications for trust research. Australian Journal of Management, 45(4), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219899450
  15. Fourie, R., & Botha, P. A. (2026). Investigating the impact of academic staff’s resistance to change on technology readiness: The mediating role of technology self-efficacy. South African Journal of Higher Education, 40(3), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.20853/40-3-6434
  16. Gearin, C. A. (2017). New higher education president integration: change and resistance viewed through social power bases and a change model lens. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(5), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1354768
  17. Georgalis, J., Samaratunge, R., Kimberley, N., & Lu, Y. (2015). Change process characteristics and resistance to organisational change: The role of employee perceptions of justice. Australian Journal of Management, 40(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896214526212
  18. Giancola, F. L. (2011). Examining the Job Itself as a Source of Employee Motivation. Compensation & Benefits Review, 43(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368710390493
  19. Guest, Greg, Bunce, Arwen, & Johnson, Laura. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  20. Hamad, W. (2022). Understanding the foremost challenges in the transition to online teaching and learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(2), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1055695
  21. Hatmanto, E., & Purwanti, E. (2019). Challenges in implementing e-learning in the language education context: case study at an English Education Department in Indonesia. Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019–Humanity, Education and Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019), 43–49.
  22. Husain, M. M. (2022). COVID-19 and crises of higher education: Responses and intensifying inequalities in the Global South. Policy Futures in Education, 20(4), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211055347
  23. Khaw, K. W., Alnoor, A., AL-Abrrow, H., Tiberius, V., Ganesan, Y., & Atshan, N. A. (2023). Reactions towards organizational change: a systematic literature review. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19137–19160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03070-6
  24. Laumer, S. (2011). Why do people reject technologies–A literature-based discussion of the phenomena “Resistance to Change” in information systems and managerial psychology research.
  25. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
  26. Lines, R. (2005). The Structure and Function of Attitudes Toward Organizational Change. Human Resource Development Review, 4(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304273818
  27. Maduforo, Aloysius Nwabugo, Salvador, Erika Eunice P, Yan, Sun, Davis, James, & Jacobsen, Michele. (2026). Global perspectives on leadership and change in higher education: A scoping review of empirical studies. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17454999261444818. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999261444818
  28. Mahmood, S. (2021). Instructional Strategies for Online Teaching in COVID‐19 Pandemic. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.218
  29. Manzoor, F., Wei, L., & Asif, M. (2021). Intrinsic Rewards and Employee’s Performance With the Mediating Mechanism of Employee’s Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 563070. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.563070
  30. Miao, S., Rhee, J., & Jun, I. (2020). How Much Does Extrinsic Motivation or Intrinsic Motivation Affect Job Engagement or Turnover Intention? A Comparison Study in China. Sustainability, 12(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093630
  31. Michel, A., Todnem By, R., & Burnes, B. (2013). The limitations of dispositional resistance in relation to organizational change. Management Decision, 51(4), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311326554
  32. Mikušková, E. B. (2020). The emotions, satisfaction and expectations of teachers during a covid-19 pandemic. ICERI2020 Proceedings, 1794–1798.
  33. Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: students’ and teachers’ perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783–793. https://doi.org/10.25215/0802.094
  34. Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247
  35. Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. In Journal of Applied Behavioral Science (pp. 461–524). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310396550
  36. Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational Change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707722
  37. Roth, P., & Haupt, A. (2025). How gender differences in informal networking result in unequal access to interorganizational R&D projects. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 38(1), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2380368
  38. Sahputri, R. A. M., Sujarwoto, S., & Haryono, B. S. (2022). Resistance behaviour among Indonesian academics experiencing policy change on international peer-review publication. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(5), 729–749. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2021-0074
  39. San-Martín, S., Jiménez, N., Rodríguez-Torrico, P., & Piñeiro-Ibarra, I. (2020). The determinants of teachers’ continuance commitment to e-learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3205–3225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10117-3
  40. Scholkmann, A. B. (2021). Resistance to (Digital) Change. In Digital Transformation of Learning Organizations (pp. 219–236). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_13
  41. Scholtz, S. E. (2021). Sacrifice is a step beyond convenience: A review of convenience sampling in psychological research in Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1837
  42. Specht, J., Kuonath, A., Pachler, D., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2018). How Change Agents’ Motivation Facilitates Organizational Change: Pathways Through Meaning and Organizational Identification. Journal of Change Management, 18(3), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2017.1378696
  43. Stumpf, S. A., Tymon, W. G., Favorito, N., & Smith, R. R. (2013). Employees and change initiatives: intrinsic rewards and feeling valued. Journal of Business Strategy, 34(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661311310422
  44. Sukirno, S. (2020). Dataset of lecturer performance appraisal. Data in Brief, 32, 106161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106161
  45. Tehseen, S., & Ul Hadi, N. (2015). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Performance and Retention. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p233
  46. Tomasik, M. J., Helbling, L. A., & Moser, U. (2021). Educational gains of in-person vs. distance learning in primary and secondary schools: A natural experiment during the COVID-19 pandemic school closures in Switzerland. International Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12728
  47. Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.132
  48. Younas, Ahtisham, Inayat, Shahzad, & Sundus, Amara. (2021). Joint displays for qualitative-quantitative synthesis in mixed methods reviews. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 2(3), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2632084320984374
  49. Zengin, Mevsim. (2026). The Effect of Resistance to Change on the Accreditation Perception in Higher Education. Sage Open, 16(2), 21582440261446710. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261446710

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 163 times
PDF
: 23 times