Improving geography learning outcomes of secondary school students through the somatic, auditory, visual, and intellectual (SAVI)

  • Harby Prasetya 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Syafri Anwar
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

Geography learning outcomes among Class XI students at SMA Negeri 1 Tigo Lurah were relatively low, as reflected in their cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, which failed to achieve the expected learning outcomes. This study aimed to improve students’ geography learning outcomes through the Somatic, Auditory, Visual, and Intellectual (SAVI) approach. The research employed a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design involving 15 secondary school students at SMA Negeri 1 Tigo Lurah during the 2023/2024 academic year. Data were collected through observation, documentation, and tests, and analyzed using qualitative (data reduction, presentation, and conclusion) and quantitative (percentile) methods. The results showed a significant improvement in student learning outcomes across all domains: the average cognitive score increased from 71.0 in the first cycle to 89.9 in the second, while affective and psychomotor domains also showed marked progress. It can be concluded that the SAVI approach effectively enhances geography learning outcomes for secondary school students.

Keywords
  • Geografi eduction, SAVI approach, Classroom action research in remote areas learning outcomes
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Adistyaningrum, N. (2020). The Effectiveness Of Savi Approach With Macromedia Flash Toward Students’ Critical Thinking Ability.
  2. Ayu, I., Sari, P., Martono, T., & Sawiji, H. (2019). The Development Of Learning Media Website Based Toward Savi Approach In Online Marketing Subjects To Improve Students’ Learning Achievement At Vocational High School State In Sukoharjo. In International Journal Of Education And Social Science Research (Vol. 2, Issue 06). Http://Ijessr.Comhttp://Ijessr.Com
  3. Benjamin S. Bloom. (1956). Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives. Longmans, Green And Co Ltd. .
  4. Bobbi De Porter. (2005). Quantum Teaching. Mizan Pustaka.
  5. Dave Meier. (2002). The Accelerated Learning.
  6. Derry. (2013). Panduan Bagi Orang Tua Untuk Memahami Faktor Faktor Penyebab Anak Kecanduan Gadget. Bisakimia.
  7. Djamarah. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar.
  8. Filiz Angay Kutluk. (2013). A Research About Mobile Learning Perspectives Of University Students Who Have Accounting Lessons. Social And Behavioral Sciences.
  9. Gwo-Jen Hwang. (N.D.). Applications, Impacts, And Trends Of Mobile Technologhy Enhanched Learning . International Journals Of Mobile Learning And Organization.
  10. Hamsiah, A., Asdar, A., & Batau, St. H. (2023). The Impact Of Savi Learning Model On Students’ Speaking Skills For Elementary Levels. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(3), 2985–2995. Https://Doi.Org/10.35445/Alishlah.V15i3.3045
  11. Hamzah. (2010). Teknologi Komunikasi Dan Informasi Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.
  12. Hwang, & Jisoo. (2014). Housewife, “Gold Miss,” And Equal: The Evolution Of Educated Women’s Role In Asia And The U.S. Ssrn Electronic Journal. Https://Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.2371979
  13. Ika Mustika Sari. (2012). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Macromedia Flash Dengan Pendekatan Savi Materi Sistem Gerak Di Sman 1 Kajen. Journal Of Biology Education.
  14. J. E. Ormrod And B. D. Jones. (2012). Essentials Of Educational Psychology: Big Ideas To Guide Effective Teaching.
  15. Khairani. (2019). Rahasia Cepat Penulisan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Unp Press.
  16. Kim, D. H., Chen, T. C., & Lin, S. C. (2019). Finance And Unemployment: New Panel Evidence. Journal Of Economic Policy Reform, 22(4), 307–324. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/17487870.2018.1451750
  17. Lin, M. F., Fulford, C. P., Ho, C. P., Iyoda, R., & Ackerman, L. K. (2012). Possibilities And Challenges In Mobile Learning For K-12 Teachers: A Pilot Retrospective Survey Study. Proceedings 2012 17th Ieee International Conference On Wireless, Mobile And Ubiquitous Technology In Education, Wmute 2012, 132–136. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Wmute.2012.31
  18. Lu, T., & Yang, X. (2018). Effects Of The Visual/Verbal Learning Style On Concentration And Achievement In Mobile Learning. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 14(5), 1719–1729. Https://Doi.Org/10.29333/Ejmste/85110
  19. Mayliana, E., & Sofyan, H. (2013). Penerapan Accelerated Learning Dengan Pendekatan Savi Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Kompetensi Menggambar Busana (Vol. 3, Issue 1).
  20. N. D. Fleming And C. Mills. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather A Catalyst For Reflection.
  21. Natsir, T., Rasyid, A. R., & Bassey, S. A. (2023). The Savi Learning Model And The 21st Century Skills: Developing Critical Thinking, Collaboration, And Creativity In Students Vocational High School. International Journal Of Environment, Engineering And Education, 5(1), 27–34. Https://Doi.Org/10.55151/Ijeedu.V5i1.96
  22. Ngalim Purwanto. (2009). Administrasi Dan Supervisi Pendidikan.
  23. Nur Tita Azizah. (2018). Peningkatan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Ips Melalui Penerapan Model Mind Mapping Berbasis Pendekatan Savi . Jurnal Pendidikan:Teori, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan.
  24. Nurrita, T. (2018). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa (Vol. 03).
  25. Oz, H. (2014). Prospective English Teachers’ Ownership And Usage Of Mobile Devices As M-Learning Tools. Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1031–1041. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Sbspro.2014.05.173
  26. Pahlave. (2014). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ipa Melalui Penerapan Pendekatan Savi Pada Siswa Kelas Iv Sdn Karanganyar 1 Kecamatan Modung Kabupaten Bangkalan. Jurnal Pendidikan Wahana Pendidikan Dasar.
  27. Putri, D. M., Leksono, I. P., & Cholid, A. (2019). The Work Of Savi Model, Direct Learning Model And Learning Motivation To Increase Learning Outcome For Elementary Students. International Journal Of Educational Technology And Learning, 6(2), 29–35. Https://Doi.Org/10.20448/2003.62.29.35
  28. R. Agusli. (2008). Panduan Koneksi Internet 3g & Hsdpa Di Handphone & Komputer. Mediakita.
  29. Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-Determination Theory Perspective On Student Engagement.
  30. Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2008). The Role Of Mobile Devices In Facilitating Collaborative Inquiry In Situ . Research And Practice In Technology Enhanced Learning, 03(03), 209–229. Https://Doi.Org/10.1142/S1793206808000525
  31. Sadirman, A. S. , R. R. , H. A. , & R. (2012). Media Pendidikan Dan Pengertian, Pengembangan Dan Pemanfaatannya. Raja Grafindo.
  32. Sardi, M. F., & Anistyasari, Y. (N.D.). Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Android Dengan Pendekatan Somatis, Auditori, Visual Dan Intelektual (Savi).
  33. Sarnoko. (2016). Penerapan Pendekatan Savi Berbantuan Video Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Ips Siswa Kelas Iv Sdn Sanan Girimarto Wonogir. Jurnal Pendidikan:Teori, Penelitian Dan Pengembanga.
  34. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. N. (2016). A Theory Of Learning For The Mobile Age. Https://Www.Researchgate.Net/Publication/343099651
  35. Shuib, L., Shamshirband, S., & Ismail, M. H. (2015). A Review Of Mobile Pervasive Learning: Applications And Issues. Computers In Human Behavior, 46, 239–244. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Chb.2015.01.002
  36. Smith, J. M., & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring The Relationship Between Metacognitive And Collaborative Talk During Group Mathematical Problem-Solving–What Do We Mean By Collaborative Metacognition? Research In Mathematics Education, 20(1), 14–36. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215
  37. Suryanto. (N.D.). Manajemen Kesiswaan.
  38. Ting, Y. L. (2013). Using Mobile Technologies To Create Interwoven Learning Interactions: An Intuitive Design And Its Evaluation. Computers And Education, 60(1), 1–13. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2012.07.004

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 116 times
PDF
: 91 times