Tracer study of the psychology faculty of UIN Raden Fatah Palembang in 2018: satisfaction of alumni and stakeholders on the implementation of Islamic psychology study programs

Listya Istiningtyas(1), Lukmawati Lukmawati(2),
(1) UIN Raden Fatah Palembang  Indonesia
(2) UIN Raden Fatah Palembang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/129200

Full Text:    Language : id

Abstract


As a Study Program in the new Faculty, it has produced over 400 alumni, but for ten years there has never been test the alumni side or from the stakeholder side (end user), so it is necessary to conduct research to test the satisfaction level of alumni and stakeholders. The research method used is a mixed-method with concurrent design, which uses quantitative and qualitative research. From the results of the study we can conclude it that the alumni feel quite satisfied with an average score of 3 on the three indicators; teaching and learning process, administration process and provision of facilities in Islamic Psychology Study Program, Faculty of Psychology. Therefore, it still needs to be improved in a lecture, computer and internet facilities. Islamic Psychology Study Program Faculty of Psychology has fulfilled most of the expectations of stakeholders and alumni. The advice given by stakeholders to the Faculty of Psychology to be more advance relates to improve physical facilities, human resources, services and competitiveness of graduates.

Keywords


tracer study; satisfaction; alumni; stakeholders; quality of service

References


Azis, S. (2016). Manajemen Mutu Perguruan Tinggi: Koreksi dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

C. H., L. (2002). Service Marketing. Second Edition, Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice Hal Inc.

Creswell, J. W. & P. C. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methode Research. Los Angeles: Sage Publcation.

Dickson, H., Harvey, J., & Blackwood, N. (2019). Feedback, feedforward: evaluating the effectiveness of an oral peer review exercise amongst postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 692–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1528341

Estaswara, H. (2010). Stakeholder Relation. Jakarta: Universitas Pancasila.

Frizsimmons, J. A., & Mona, J. F. (2001). Service Management: Operation, Strategy and Information. New York: McGraw Hill Tata McGraw-Hill.

Handayani, R., & Keban, Y. T. (2004). Analisis Kepuasan Pemakai Terhadap Pelayanan Perpustakaan Nasional Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta= An Analysis on User Satisfaction of the Services Provided by National Library of Yogyakarta Province. Sosiosains, 17(2004).

Kearney, K. S., Naifeh, Z., Hammer, T., & Cain, A. (2019). “Family” Ties for foster alumni in college: An open systems consideration. Review of Higher Education, 42(2), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0015

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2006). Marketing Management: Customer value, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty (12th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Kotler, P. (2004). Manajemen Pemasaran: Analisis, Perencanaan, implementasi dan Kontrol, Edisi Sebelas. Jakarta: Prenhallindo.

Liu, J., & Ni, G. (2020). An efficient optimal algorithm for high frequency in wavelet based image reconstruction. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 28(5), 865–878. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2s2.085063649888&partnerID=40&md5=c73a91d74740899b3e84a7182af5fac8

Mashoufi, M., Ayatollahi, H., & Khorasani-Zavareh, A. D. (2019). Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services: What Are the Stakeholders’ Perspectives? Perspectives in Health Information Management, 16(Winter). Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061601036&partnerID=40&md5=fcab933b9dd4c303ea4f2334ce7d16b3

Mitrofanova, E. A., Simonova, M. V, & Tarasenko, V. V. (2020). Potential of the education system in Russia in training staff for the digital economy. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_46

Muafi, & Siswanti, Y. (2007). Anteseden Ekuitas Merek Perguruan Tinggi: SEM dengan Pendekatan Two Step. Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia, 36(3).

Mulyasa, D. (2012). Pendidikan Bermutu Dan Berdaya Saing. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Panji, A. (2007). Analisis Faktor-Faktor kualitas Pelayanan Yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Mahasiswa Pada Perguruan Tinggi “AUB” Surakarta.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithamel, V. A., & L.L., B. (1994). Reassesment of Expectation as a Comparasion Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implication for Further Reaserch. Journal Of Marketing, 58.

Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3

Psikologi, F. (2017a). Pedoman Akademik Program Studi Psikologi Islam. Palembang: UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.

Psikologi, F. (2017b). Rencana Strategi Fakultas Psikologi Tahun 2017-2022. Palembang: UIN Raden Fatah Palembang.

Rolbina, E. S., Novikova, E. N., Sharafutdinova, N. S., Martynova, O. V, & Akhmetshin, R. M. (2020). Analysis and assessment of quality of medical services in conditions of digital transformation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_67

Ruben, B. D. (1999). Toward A Balanced Scorecard for Higher Education: Rethinking the College and University Excellence IndicatorFramwork. Higher Education Forum 99-02 Fall, 1999. New Jersey: The Hunter Groupintheir Higher Education White Paper Series.

Sadat, A. M. (2000). Analisis Hubungan Kinerja Jasa Perguruan Tinggi terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa: Studi Kasus Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Ekonomi dan Manajemen Universitas Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukanti. (2009). Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Akuntansi FISE UNY. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(1).

Tjiptono, F. (2008). Strategi Pemasaran. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Tjiptono, F., & Diana, A. (2003). Total Quality Management. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Vesloguzova, M. V, Petrik, L. S., Salikhov, K. M., & Bunakov, O. A. (2020). Monitoring as a tool to ensure the quality of services provided in the interaction of service organizations and municipal authorities in economy digitalization. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11367-4_33

Zhang, R., & Smith, L. (2019). Bonding and dissonance: Rethinking the Interrelations Among Stakeholders in Heritage Tourism. Tourism Management, 74, 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.03.004


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 131 times
 PDF Downloaded : 28 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.